this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
600 points (99.3% liked)

News

33196 readers
2430 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Justice Department posted pardons online bearing identical copies of Donald Trump’s signature before quietly correcting them this week after what the agency called a “technical error.”

The replacements came after online commenters seized on striking similarities in the president’s signature across a series of pardons dated Nov. 7, including those granted to former New York Mets player Darryl Strawberry, former Tennessee House speaker Glen Casada and former New York police sergeant Michael McMahon.

In fact, the signatures on several pardons initially uploaded to the Justice Department’s website were identical, two forensic document experts confirmed to The Associated Press.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 57 points 4 days ago (4 children)

IANAL but wouldn't that make every one of those pardons now fraudulent and invalid?

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 44 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Would it shock you to hear that they’ve been breaking the law the whole time and getting away with it?

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago
[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

your mom's null is hypothetical

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As much as I'd like that to be true, probably not. Automatic signature machines have been a thing, especially for presidential signatures, for a while now. This is more a hit to Trump's ego than anything.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm not talking about the autopen. I'm talking about going back after the fact and changing the signature from the autopen to something else, thus imho, invalidating the document.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If it invalidates the first by removing the signature, it revalidates it by adding another from an authorized signer.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah I don't know if that's how it works after the pardon has already been invoked or whatever.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Only if there is gold fringe on the document.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The MAGAs have been making the argument that Biden signed Hunter's pardon with an autopen, so the pardon is invalid. If that's true, then so are Trump's pardons. I'm good with that, let's round up all the J6 traitors. I doubt he personally signed over 1000 pardons.

Also, did he sign any of his Executive Orders with an autopen, because they're invalid, too.

Just following THEIR rules.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Its not eve n about the autopen in their opinion, its that Biden wasn't supposedly aware of what he was signing.

So what I say is have Trump name every executive order he has made and any one that he misses gets instantly struck down.

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 3 days ago

Similarly, every time he says something stupid like, ' I don't even know the guy...' that should invalidate a pardon.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I doubt he personally signed over 1000 pardons.

You know, you can have more than one name on a single pardon, or just name an entire group like "everyone who was accused of any crime at or near the capital on January 6, 2021". Also dude is still the incumbent, what good is invalidating the autopen thing?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Specifying a whole group and not giving names seems like it should probably be unconstitutional? Like you could just use it to unilaterally undo any law, which isn’t the intent of the pardon system. IANAL

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean, the people who dodged the Vietnam War got pardoned that way... so it can be used for good...

It's a double-edge sword.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago

Under literally any Democratic administration, yes.