this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
377 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

17369 readers
1300 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think that's an easy one: Hitler is dead and, as far as I know, never had any direct descendants or relatives that could object on valid reasons.

[–] thessnake03@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Hitler's (half?) nephew served in the US Navy during WW2. ~~I don't think William has any remaining kin though.~~ Looks like William has four children, 3 of whom may still be alive. None of those 4 have had any children of their own.

https://lyonairmuseum.org/blog/corpsman-hitler-us-navy/

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago

A niece or nephew isn't a direct descendant

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why should doing experiments on ones bodily components be an opt-out situation?

[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Whether it be an opt-out or -in situation is beyond the topic of this question, but neither are applicable here.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

There is nobody who has consented or is still able to consent to any experiments being conducted on his remains. Dudes a fucking disgusting stain on the canvas of humanity. Doesn't mean consent is void. Opt-out, in my original reply, was pointing to the fact you think that "the absence of a voice against consent" is effectively consenting.