this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

4206 readers
107 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WELLINGTON — New Zealand said on Wednesday it was banning new prescriptions of puberty blocking drugs for young transgender people, in a move that critics warned could worsen the mental health of those affected.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They are a bad thing though. Not because of the horseshit FUD reasons transphobes say, but they are a bad thing. They're a necessary evil at best. Ideally every trans kid would go through puberty at the same age as their peers. Sometimes people aren't sure of themselves and need some additional time to think things through, but in an ideal world, people would figure this stuff out long before puberty even starts. Puberty blockers are a necessary evil, but in an ideal world, no one would be on them except kids who get very early precocious puberties.

Trans kids having to start puberty at 16, 17, or 18 is not a good outcome. Not when they're now years behind their peers developmentally. A trans girl should be able to get her first bra at the same age her cis female classmates do. A trans boy shouldn't have to go through the awkwardness of learning how to shave while in college. Trans kids should be able to have all the normal developmental experiences cis kids have, at the ages everyone else gets to. Today, sometimes puberty blockers cannot be avoided, but in an ideal world, puberty blockers would have no use at all in gender-affirming care.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago

I agree in an ideal world that would be the case, and i too believe it's worth working toward that ideal world. But unfortunately we are not there yet, hence my comment on puberty blockers themselves aren't a bad thing. I don't mind you seeing them a necessary evil, but i myself consider them more a necessary.