Programming

23594 readers

119 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

UlrikHD@programming.dev

Code vibe check (piefed.social)

submitted 2 days ago by Lojcs@piefed.social to c/programming@programming.dev

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Wrote this to reduce boilerplate when calling a function with a nullable parameter. Language is Dart. I like how concise it is but it feels weird to override []. Would you be okay with this?

extension CallMaybe<R, T> on R Function(T t) {  
  R? callMaybe(T? t) => switch (t) {  
    null => null,  
    T t => this(t),  
  };  

  R? operator [](T? t) => callMaybe(t);  
}  

void example() {  
  int? n;  
  math.sqrt[n];  
}

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you're using [] as an alternative function call syntax to (), usable with nullable parameters?

What's the alternative? let x = n is null ? null : math.sqrt(n);?

In principle, I like the idea. I wonder whether something with a question mark would make more sense, because I'm used to alternative null handling with question marks (C#, ??, ?.ToString(), etc). And I would want to see it in practice before coming to an early conclusion on whether to establish as a project principle or not.

math.sqrt?() may imply the function itself may be null. (? ) for math.sqrt(?n)? 🤔

I find [] problematic because it's an index accessor. So it may be ambiguous between prop or field indexed access and method optional param calls. Dunno how that is in Dart specifically.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah pretty much as you said. I tried overriding ?[] to make it more clear but apparently ? operators can't be overriden.

I think I'll go for .callMaybe()