this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
643 points (93.7% liked)

Comic Strips

20279 readers
1953 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Peinlich, wenn man einen Link postet, der die eigene Position wiederlegt:

Auf drei- oder mehrspurigen Straßen muss man rechts fahren. Autofahrende dürfen bei einer dreispurigen Straße den mittleren Fahrstreifen allerdings dann durchgängig befahren, wenn rechts davon hin und wieder Fahrzeuge unterwegs sind. Die ADAC Verkehrsexperten erläutern: "Diese Lockerung des Rechtsfahrgebots soll die Zahl der gefährlichen Spurwechsel und ein Fahren in Schlangenlinien vermeiden."

Aber hauptsach nicht verstehen, dass "Supreme Court" einfach nur "Oberstes Gericht" bedeutet und es solche auch in Deutschland gibt.

Einfach zum Fremdschämen, dein Kommentar.


So that English speakers can understand what happened here:

@Pueblo@feddit.org posted a link that verified what I said, claiming that it disproved what I said, because apparently posting links without reading the content is cool.

Also, they didn't know what "supreme court" meant and thought that only existed in the USA.

[–] Pueblo@feddit.org -4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well do are not able to translate sipreme curt correctly and u oversee on purpose what the article says. Its not nessasary when u have to drive "snake lines" so its common sense not driving at hogh risk. It contains also, that u have to leave a certain distance witch is not possible in that case. If there is enough space u have to drive to the right lane.

And ur wording shows what kind of person u are so i dont give a fuck for what u feel shame.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, noch mal zum Mitschreiben:

Ich hab geschrieben: "In Germany it is legal to drive in the middle lane if there’s at least infrequent slower traffic on the right."

Der ADAC hat geschrieben: "Autofahrende dürfen bei einer dreispurigen Straße den mittleren Fahrstreifen allerdings dann durchgängig befahren, wenn rechts davon hin und wieder Fahrzeuge unterwegs sind."

Das ist eins zu eins das Gleiche.

Hast du's jetzt verstanden?

[–] Pueblo@feddit.org -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No its not. Infrequent means some cars from time to time and thats in fact not the same.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Infrequent means some cars from time to time and thats in fact not the same.

Wie sagt man "from time to time" auf Deutsch?

Genau: "Hin und wieder".

Was hat noch mal der ADAC geschrieben?

Oh, ja, "Hin und wieder".

[–] Pueblo@feddit.org 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

From time to time isnt a clearly definied term, so that would revoke the rechtsfahrgebot in General. It has this too: it should prevent risky laneswaps. If u want to understand it that way, it explains why they print on pizzas: remove the packaging before putting in the oven. That would explain why the afd gets so many votes and is a public critism to our schoolsystem.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Ok, so now your source isn't good enough for you, because you know better than the ADAC. Gotcha.