this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2302 readers
59 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lagrangeinterpolator@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

We will secure energy dominance by dumping even more money and resources into a technology that is already straining our power grid. But don't worry. The LLM will figure it all out by reciting the Wikipedia page for Fusion Power.

AI is expected to make cutting-edge simulations run “10,000 to 100,000 times faster.”

Turns out it's not good to assume that literally every word that comes out of a tech billionaire's mouth is true. Now everyone else thinks they can get away with just rattling off numbers where their source is they made it the fuck up. I still remember Elon Musk saying a decade ago that he could make rockets 1,000 times cheaper, and so many people just thought it was going to happen.

We need scientists and engineers. We do not need Silicon Valley billionaire visionary innovator genius whizzes with big ideas who are pushing the frontiers of physics with ChatGPT.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 2 points 13 hours ago

The anthropomorphic personification of magnetohydrodynamics materializes from the ether to laugh in their faces

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

tbf, when your "normal" rocket construction process involves mass national ratfuckery as inefficient as it was/is...1000x cheaper is actually pretty doable.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

“10,000 to 100,000 times faster.”

You know they meant they'd ask a chatbot

[–] lagrangeinterpolator@awful.systems 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

True, it is possible to achieve 100,000x speedups if you dispose of the silly restriction of being correct.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 1 points 13 hours ago

Username checks out