this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
301 points (98.1% liked)

politics

26495 readers
1678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If the only solution is democrats never losing then it’s not a workable solution.

They will lose at some point, and we need to be prepared for that and not let it completely undo any changes they’ve managed to squeak through with only the presidency and a supermajority in both houses.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think significant progress could be seen if they could win 4 times in a row with at least one senate super majority and house simple majority stretch near the end.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Republicans made sure we can never have another FDR

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

When they lose it needs to be cause they were not left enough they need to lose I. Primaries when they fail to support the leftist positions we need.

If that's not workable, then it's not going to work, and eventually it will break. I don't like it but I didn't design this system.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

When they lose it needs to be cause they were not left enough they need to lose

This idea that you can punish the DNC by having them lose, is a foot gun.

They are 100% happy with that and it absolutely would not cause them to shift even a centimeter left. If anything, it will shift them right.

The DNC wants to please their corporate donors, and only wants to win half the time.

You want to punish them? Replace them slowly using primaries, state and local politics.

Anything else is shooting yourself in the foot by misunderstanding the incentive structures.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I didn't mean "when they lose to Republicans, it needs to be because they weren't left enough" I meant "when they lose an election, it needs to be because there was a farther left candidate that won"

Conservatives need to never win an election again in my lifetime. Maybe if the Republican party moved left of the Democratic party, or if a third party gained popularity and was left if the Democrats.

But realistically, it has to happen in primaries.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Sorry to say but it’s going to break