Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Lot was raped by his daughters. Are we victim blaming now?
You kind of remind me when 'the right' undermines the trans rights movement because a handful of mass shooters or sex offenders were transgender people.
Ohhhh, ohhh, you think?
Matthew 7:21-23
Would be a bit of a shame if you thought you would be separated from them, just to be thrown in the same pit with them.
All the rest of that nonsense you are claiming about slavery have already debunked. You're not rebutting my argument, just repeating the same claims I addressed mindlessly. If you really want me to demonstrate more that the Bible doesn't promote these things, I will.
"Are we victim blaming now?"
If you are, you should stop. Christians victim-blame too regularly.
good for you to acknowledge lot's christian misogyny! Lot begs a mob to rape his daughters to save his guests. Very christian(misogynist) and disgusting.
Lot drank some wine. You believe he was so drunk he didn't realize his own daughters were having sex with him to completion for 48 hours? Ludicrous.
"Ohhhh, ohhh, you think?...did we not prophesy..."
Fiction and speculation is useless here. You have the relevant christian biblical quotes above detailing christian slavery, christian misogyny, and christian greed, and we know that in real life christians are pedophiles, rapists and murderers.
Either jesus is teaching pedophilia and murder to christians, or christians are raping chlidren and murdering people because jesus cannot control his flock.
either way, jesus is a terrible "master".
"...I addressed mindlessly"
try addressing the quotes mindfully.
Jesus endorses misogyny, slavery and incest in "his" book, and so does anyone who worships his words.
"If you really want me to demonstrate more that the bible doesn't promote these things..."
This thread is simply a guide on how to debunk christian self-delusions.
I heartily encourage you to try again.
Easy for you to say, since you're not in Lot's position. So what, he should have been misandrist instead and let them rape the men? They didn't even rape the daughters anyway, they were sodomites.
Having sex with a drunk person is rape.
And we know that in real life atheists are paedophiles, rapists and murderers.
and we know that in real life muslims are paedophiles, rapists and murderers.
and we know that in real life satanists are paedophiles, rapists and murderers.
See? It's almost as if such people exist in literally every group of humans that exist.
Convenient not to give any more examples apart from what I've already debunked. Define "misogyny" while you're at it.
You keep using "debunk" incorrectly.
You have been proven ignorant about your bible and incorrect about your god. This does not mean you have "debunked" anything,
It is not misandry because those men were not being attacked specifically because they were men; it is misogyny for Lot to claim ownership over his daughters and offer them to be raped specifically because he values them less as women.
jesus endorses slavery in his own words in multiple passages.
jesus endorses incest in his own words in multiple passages.
jesus endorses misogyny in his own words in multiple passages.
Those are written, verifiable passages supplied above for your reference. You are ignorant of you own book, but those passages exist.
jesus endorses misogyny, incest and slavery in the christian bible and so does anyone who endorses that novel.
"supplied above" when you haven't even supplied them
I think that's because they weren't angels literally sent from God, not because they were women 🙄 either that or he was exposing the sodomites for not being interested in women, but instead being interested in men
You can play pretend, but you've directly responded to the biblical passages I've supplied in previous comments, so it's foolish of you to make believe.
lot valued women so low as to offer for his own daughters to be raped. You empathize with this bigotry, but your empathy for bigotry doesn't make christian misogyny, slavery, incest, hoarding wealth or pedophilia okay.