528
Trump had Epstein killed because he was going to "name names," Epstein's brother claims
(www.lgbtqnation.com)
Any politics anywhere in the world. Inevitably it'll be 99% US stuff, but that's not a rule.
This community works differently to how most politics communities work. It has strict rules designed to facilitate productive discussion. You can be rude, to a point, but you can't participate in bad faith:
The idea is to make the discussion productive. Let's see how it works. Maybe this is a fool's errand but IDK how any set of moderation could be worse than lemmy.world.
Other misc rules:
You were saying to use ctrl F to magic the problem away. That requires OCR.
That's the whole problem - there's no one magic trick to solve the issue. It requires manual scanning and manual review.
Some archotectural or site plan building sets include 200-page rolls of Arch E sheets of mylar. For reference, laid out on the ground that would take up about 6-times the floor area of a 2-car garage. That's over 10 hours of just scanning.
Some of those pages contain 6pt font notes, and we're required to review it ALL manually because there's a bunch of information we're not allowed to release in an ORR (PII, certain critical public infrastructure details, security-related issues, email addresses, information hinting at the identity or residence of anyone related to a retired court officer, and more).
Uhh… because you specified emails and text messages. Which don’t require OCR. So it can be used in THOSE situations. I also never said it was this magic do all, I specified it was a TOOL to HELP.
If you can’t even read a comment before responding, I’m done. Cheers troll!
I made a post that was 3/4 about OCR-related issues (including why it's specifically an issue in emails with embedded images containing text). You made a flippant reposnse that didn't address OCR issues and called me out as ignorant and lazy.
I responded explaining some OCR issues again. You called me technologically illiterate for not doing a text search.
So I explained for a third time that you can't just trust ctrl-F, and now you're saying I'm the one not bothering to read what I'm replying to.