435
Seven Diabetes Patients Die Due to Undisclosed Bug in Abbott's Continuous Glucose Monitors
(sfconservancy.org)
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
435 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
78029 readers
4915 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This makes me think of Norton in fight club discussing recalls.
A times B times C equals X...If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.
The older I get, the more I understand (I mean, really understand) Tyler Durden. And I hate that this is so.
Edit. Put the parenthetical in the wrong place
Always use the indefinite article... "a", never "your". 😉
Damn, I gotta watch that movie again.
You can only really see it once.
It's more fun on a rewatch. Going in knowing you catch a lot of things you missed the first time.
FDA mandates how recalls happen, pharmaceutical or medical device.
Do they still exist?
De facto or de jure?
Can you please speak American so I can understand it?
They're asking "technically or actually in practice?".
Thanks.
They have to have information.