this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
752 points (95.6% liked)

Political Humor

1636 readers
443 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it would be hilariously ironic if not for the tragedy.

"We can't try anarchy, because bad people will become warlords! Then they'll compete and the winner will take full control as a dictator!"

"Uh huh, and what do we call that?"

"Anarchy! That's why I'm voting for fascism!"

[Facepalm]

I'm actually not a big fan of anarchy, but the idea that it's worse than Totalitarianism seems pretty silly to me.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It’s doubly hilarious when you realize anarchy isn’t that.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Anarchy isn't that. It's just what happens when people try to install it in a geopolitical environment that's inherently imperialistic. It would be interesting to see what kind of social structures are possible without outside interference, but I don't expect to see that in my lifetime.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Anarchy" is a transition state, almost always to something worse. The point of instituting a democracy is to prevent that something worse. Granted, that doesn't always work, but it's better than nothing.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's not the anarchy they're talking about. "Anarchy" here refers to the state of society sought by anarchism.

yeah i call that libertarianism