this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
237 points (93.4% liked)

Comic Strips

20802 readers
3039 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Val@anarchist.nexus 9 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Is the fact that the start of spring is 2 months after the solstice arbitrary? Seems a pretty clear cause and effect.

But honestly we should make a new calendar that starts on the spring solstice, is subdivided by solstices, and doesn't have weeks (I just don't like them).

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It'd still be a mess anyway. How do you subdivide your two year halves? What do your months look like? If they still exist.

Assuming you use equinoxes too, you can split your year in 4... Except since you've got 365 days to split, it will never be a perfect split.

And turns out the Earth doesn't care about synchronizing rotation and revolution and the year is actually about 365.24 days. so you still have freaking leap days every four years, except not every hundred year, except yes please every 400. Or whatever rule you make to fix the inevitable deviation.

[–] Val@anarchist.nexus 3 points 24 minutes ago

I mean we define year as being from one spring equinox¹ to the next, no matter if it's 365 or 366 days. So if we made next year 1 it would be from 20th of March 2026 14:46 UTC to the next 20th of march 2027 20:25 UTC (The first day of the year could be day 0, the last of the old year but still also in new year, to account for the fact that it's not midnight.). The months would be replaced with quarters(seasons), ending on: June 21, September 23, December 21. Every year the dates would slightly shift because of the way orbits work, but there is no leap year math.

The first quarter, spring, has 93 days, the second, summer, 94 and so on. These will probably be subdivided a multitude of ways. Quickly sketching I found 6 * 4 * 4 - (3 or 4) which seems to work, though I'm naturally draw to base6 due to it being highly composite. This makes 24 days in a quarter-season. A nice analogue to the hours.

A sketch of a calendar. Spring 01 is written on the top. The days are marked by white squares. The days are split into four sections. There are "S1", "S2", "S3" and "S4" written next to the sections. An arrow points to the first day with the text "This would be March 21". There is another arrow with the text "This would be June 21" pointing to the last day.

I think this calendar works better because it doesn't attempt to add any human control over a completely chaotic system: Earths orbit speed and rotational period. The underlying principle is chaotic and humans should build systems that are build on top of this natural disorder. By attempting to define and control disorder you must create so many convoluted rules (Like the leap day rule). Our calendar is an example of the human desire to "fix" nature to our own way of life instead of leaning to coexist with the natural disorderly processes that govern our lives. It's the same mindset that gives us the blatant disregard for the natural resources or climate.

This is a rather anarchic position but that's because I cannot help but inject anarchic rhetoric into my thought process due to so much of the way we live has been in blatantly build using archic concepts, even the calendar is dripping with it.

¹: Accidentally called it solstice sense I forgot there's a different word.

[–] Hismama@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

One of the more interesting calendar concepts I've heard where every date falls on the same day of the week year after year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanke%E2%80%93Henry_Permanent_Calendar

[–] Val@anarchist.nexus 1 points 18 minutes ago

This was the first thing that made me realise that calendars could be changed. I myself don't like it because it because It doesn't use fixed points. But it is an inspiration for the calendar that I described in the other comment. It's the "don't do this" kind of inspiration but I think it counts.