this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
161 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1087 readers
609 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They have bombs, for fucks sake! What they need for weapons systems is missiles. Reactor parts aren't missile parts, AFAIK.

not that concerned

No but not completely unconcerned! Its useful for their grip on power and PR wins.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The reactor parts according the article were VM-4SG models. The same used by russian nuclear submarines. Dont take a genius to assume NK is planning on building nuclear submarines to load'em with nuclear missiles.

Oh and the other fact they already annouced just that.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe. Why not just send them a fucking submarine and do a few retrofits? Much easier to transport.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Submarines are sealed units. You can't really retrofit them. If it doesn't fit through a hatch, you have to cut the hull, which can create a weakness when it's under pressure.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because a submarine is much more expensive than reactor parts? I dont think NK has 800million dollars to give russia. Plus, NK would love nothing more than boast about their own nuclear submarine.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can afford new but not cold war hand-me-downs?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Does russia have spare surplus? Pretty sure they scrapped everything thats not in active duty.