this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
589 points (98.0% liked)

News

33901 readers
2982 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel’s foreign ministry has accused the New York mayor, Zohran Mamdani, of pouring “antisemitic gasoline on an open fire” after he reversed a recent order by the outgoing mayor, Eric Adams.

“On his very first day as @NYCMayor, Mamdani shows his true face: he scraps the IHRA definition of antisemitism and lifts restrictions on boycotting Israel. This isn’t leadership. It’s antisemitic gasoline on an open fire,” the foreign ministry said in a post on X.

Mamdani revoked an Adams-era order that adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism, which the previous administration said included “demonizing Israel and holding it to double standards as forms of contemporary antisemitism”.

Israel’s response came hours after Mamdani issued an order to rescind all executive orders that Adams issued after he was indicted on federal corruption charges in 2024 – charges that were later, controversially, dropped.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

NYC has the largest jewish commiunity outside israel, many of which anti-zionists, and it shows how people of different faiths can co-live peacefully, so you can see why isreal wants to influence our politics

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 day ago

breaking my hiatus to say this:

New York is the present day Lviv in what it meant to Jewish identity before the rise of zionism following the Odessa Pogroms. israel knows this. they want to re-evoke the origins of their movement. they want to control what it means to be Jewish.

but Jewishness is defined for a lot of Jews not by our connection to Levantine soil, but instead our opposition to oppression. fuck zionism forever. and fuck its need to reignite hate against semitic people to create a self fulfilling prophecy that we cannot be safe in our own communities.

israel is pharaoh.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's clear why they want to but why are our news outlets amplifying their messages. They shouldn't be

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

but why are our news outlets amplifying their messages. They shouldn’t be

Because "our" "news" outlets are owned by the same people who funded the opposition to Mamdani in the first place.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

The Guardian, which isn't a US site, highlighting Israel's misdirection and dishonesty

“our news outlets amplifying their messages”

Ah yes. Well noticed there, gewd jerb.

P.S. Apparently you're not aware that I can see you downvoting every single comment of mine, as if that helps your ridiculous stance in any way. So far you downvoted three of my comments that have nothing to do with this thread.

P.P.S. This loser is going through my whole comment history downvoting the comments.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The Guardian has been massively pro-Israel for most of their Genocide in Gaza and even now that they toned down the very overt support for it, still uses two-tiered language when it comes to Israel and Palestinians, such as using "says" or "states" for statements from the former whilst for the latter using "claims", reporting on deaths by saying that Israelis "were killed" whilst Palestinians merely "died", describing attacks on civilians as "terrorism" if done by Hamas but not if done by Israel and, more generally, using the kind of language towards Israel that produces the impression of them being "righteous" and "one of us" whilst for Palestinians languages that dehumanizes them and/or produces the impression of them being "criminals" and "not one of us".

Further, The Guardian is pretty much "The Voice Of The English Upper and Upper Middle Class", who are definitely people siding with American fatcats same as they side with their own fatcats and with pretty much the entire elite privilege-preserving infrastructure over there (their coverage of The Royals is the very definition of "fawning").

They're basically the British equivalent of the New York Times.

So yeah, it's absolutely logical to suspect that The Guardian are purposefully "amplifying their messages" because that's something entirely consistent with how they've always treated Israel.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know they are a uk based news outlet but they are popular here and market to Americans like they expect us to read it and they still aren't Israeli so what's your point?

Also it not just this paper reporting this crap it's nonstop.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh no! A UK-based news outlet dares to write about things happening outside of the UK, unlike every other news outlet in the world. And they've become popular in the US, how dare they! This definitely means they're ‘our’ US news site, like every cowardly and duplicitous US news outlet, which is all of them.

And they're also still ‘aren't Israeli’, whatever the fuck that means despite The Guardian consistently criticizing Israel's attempts at the inflammatory foreign policy and comments, and you being deliberately blind to all of that. So what does your incoherent drivel mean?

P.S. I can still see you downvoting my unrelated comments, dummy.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was saying that a news outlet that I used to respect is using their platform to amplify the propaganda of a hostile foreign leader. I don't understand what your problem is with that. Maybe you just have problems in general?

I said "our news outlets" because this is a place I normally get my news you fucking idiot.

I was expressing disgust with the paper I read. But you really got me!

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

amplify the propaganda of a hostile foreign leader

Not only you're dumb beyond belief as to interpret things as that, but of course you also downvote every comment of mine here and there as if they have anything to do with anything, like that helps your argument in any way.

Please continue to spout ridiculous nonsense as to how any site you ever visited is “your news outlet”, that will surely fortify your view.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like you are just a Zionist anyways. Probably a "settler".

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh yeah, anyone who downvotes your nonsensical drivel any time per your hundreds of downvotes is a 'settler'. Just like it works with Israelites. But somehow you're not one of them asswipes hijacking actual constructive discussion, are you? No, you're just one of the incoherent clowns repeating the same accusations against people opposed to actual political discussion, aren't you?