this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
767 points (99.0% liked)

News

34074 readers
3080 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is getting dark but at this point US is clearly on a path to start using their powerful military to invade and occupy other countries. They are becoming the Nazi Germany of the XXI century but since they have nuclear weapons no one will be able to stop them. This will basically mean new cold war between US and China (and maybe EU if they manage to unite and develop a common position). So yeah, a lot of suffering ahead of us with a chance of nuclear war.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Except that, if China went full cold war with the US, all they'd have to do is stop selling to the US and the entire US economy would collapse. Not to mention that economic sanctions against the US would cripple the country completely, because Trump would just immediately default on the country's debt (as he loves to do) and, oh yeah, the entire NYSE would crater to 0 in about 5 minutes flat.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

the scenario in which China just stops selling to the US would probably collapse China's economy too. Think about it. Why is the national debt so high? How is it that high and yet "most prosperous nation in the world"? International investment. There's a lot of money invested from China and other countries. Their investments are only good so long as the American economy is good. International investors can leverage American debt to them as sort of capital asset to thereby invest in other things.....

It's a giant domino effect. When China pulls out, the American economy will likely collapse.... but, then all the money people had invested and had leveraged also collapse.... and so then those international investors can't pay their debts because they have nothing to leverage it with and thus also collapse... and so on and so forth.... the ripple is wide.

But while america has been investing in making itself dependent on foreign resources, China has been investing in making other countries dependent on theirs. I think that, if it were about the math of overall risk, China has less risk from the us. There are wartime measures that can boost an economy, but they require that economy to actually have the resources necessary to function.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

the scenario in which China just stops selling to the US would probably collapse China's economy too

While the US may be one of their biggest single customer (representing about 16% of China's exports), they're far from China's only customer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_China

The EU is almost the same size of market as the US, and the southeast Asian countries as a group are a larger customer than either of those.

Cutting off the US won't cripple China. Plus the Chinese government is very willing to play the long game if they can foresee an eventual positive outcome for themselves.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Which would suck for American citizens but dictators usually don't really care about those. I don't think this administration sees US public as an obstacle anymore. They survived ICE raids and Epstein backlash. Everyone just stands their ground, there were 0 resignations. They built up their gestapo real fast, National Guard fell in line and the military has no problems fallowing illegal orders. They still take it easy because they don't really have to go full fascist dictator right now but they know nothing will stop them when they have to do it.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okay, let's be clear: there were MANY resignations, but resignations are not always effective

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm talking about his core team. Even Hegseth and Waltz are still there. Press secretaries usually don't last long but Leavitt is still there. Kennedy is still there. I might be missing somebody but nobody from his core team resigned. During his previous term he had 4 press secretaries and 4 Chiefs of Staff. This time no one moves despite massive fuckups and controversies.

Ah, yes. They're all sycophants now.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If China stopped selling to the US, it would devastate their economy as much as ours. It's Mutually Assured Economic Destruction.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

My only disagreement is that I think it would not be equal, not that there would not be devastation.

Trump's ridiculous tariffs are doing the beginning of the legwork for them.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trouble is, China and Russia are quite happy to have spheres of influence that don't overlap with the US'. The only issues are places like Taiwan, where the US still has some kind of residual genetic memory that letting China take it over would be bad - though as the US regime manifests its destiny ever harder I expect they'll realise that makes no sense in their own worldview.

It really doesn't leave many big players interested in a rules-based international order. My understanding is that African nations by and large don't give a shit about Ukraine.

The problem for anyone still interested in it is that they're torn between trying to keep whatever scrap of interest the US has in upholding national sovereignty in Ukraine and making any meaningful progress on what happens when Trump finally abandons it for good, or annexes Greenland.

Trying to keep Trump onside makes short-term sense, but in the long term European citizens need to be prepared for worse standards of living as the cost of defence and goods increases because we need to become independent of the US. If you fail to articulate the necessity of that independence, there'll be more backlash against the sacrifice. Far-right parties will be the beneficiaries of that backlash, who will happily put their respective countries under the boot of whichever fascist autocrat they prefer.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 3 days ago

100% agree. EU is totally failing on messaging ever since Trump won his first term. They still pretend everything will be fine and they can maintain the status quo indefinitely. I see two options here:

  1. EU wakes the fuck up and realized they can only survive together, stands up to Trump and unites around a common cause (both politicians and citizens). Trade war will hit us hard but we can save our freedom

  2. EU continues to fall apart while every country only cares about their own short term interest, each country falls under the influence of USA, China or Russia and becomes a puppet state

Right now we're heading straight for option 2.