this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
446 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

78627 readers
2896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
446
This CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it again (fortune.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“Every single Monday was called ‘AI Monday,’” Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could work only on AI. “You couldn’t have customer calls; you couldn’t work on budgets; you had to only work on AI projects.” He said this happened across the board, not just for tech workers, but also for sales, marketing, and everybody else at IgniteTech. “That culture needed to be built. That was the key.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder how many employees are working on automating the CEO there first

[–] Bleys@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From the article:

Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the “most resistant,” he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn’t do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added.

Not surprising the people with technical skills that aren’t actually replaceable by LLMs would be against forced AI adoption. Good luck maintaining a code base created with vibe coding. Meanwhile the CEO probably looks at ChatGPT and realizes it could basically do everything he already does (write emails and make high level decisions without actually having to worry about their implementation) and then incorrectly thinks it’s the case for everyone else.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I deal with this at work. Two engineers love AI, myself and the other engineer hate it. We're mechanical. It's funny when a material standard doesn't exist...

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Prediction markets have outperformed CEOs for decades and still haven't replaced them, for the same reason WfH hasn't replaced offices. Everything is a monopoly or oligopoly now, with no need to efficiently maximize profits. It's entirely a matter of control.