that writer's name is all you need to know. always look at the writer's name and their previous work to identify industry shills
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
444 points (94.4% liked)
Technology
78627 readers
2824 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A company so small it doesn't even have a Wikipedia page. No discernible products.
Any poly market bets on how long this company actually lasts?
a platform for AI-based email automation
the built a ChatGPT wrapper like all the other revolutionary AI companies lol the world needs more automated spam!
Their website barely even works it honestly looks like a scam organisation. I can't find any description of what it is that they actually do which makes me believe that they don't do anything.
So business grinds to a halt? That's crazy.
Because it had nothing to do with AI
It was an excuse to slash the workforce with relatively little backlash.
and that's how he achieved 75% profit margin. Let's see him do that twice.
surprised he didn't golden parachute out and reload with another company/
Not hard to fire everyone and net a profit, once.
May a large object fall on him. Death is the only solution to these people.
it seems its your mind that cant change
Probably overhired just after COVID like everyone else in the tech sector and then realized he had no idea what to do with all the extra people because he never really had a plan.
COVID excuse not required. CEOs overhiring is like birds flying south for the winter, the sun rising in the east, water being wet - it's just what they do. 80% is a bit extreme, but he had the AI excuse, so...
load more comments
(2 replies)
Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the “most resistant,” he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn’t do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added.
So the people that had an actual idea of what the implications of using it might be weren't on board? Huh. Weird.
"All the engineers said my "screen door on a submarine" was "stupid" and would "sink the ship", so I fired them and hired new engineers!"
- CEO of now defunct "Screen Door Subs Inc."
speaking of submarines, this is the exact line of thinking that turned an idiot CEO into a paste at the bottom of the ocean
thank you mighty wizard for casting dopamine.
I can not read the word "cast" in any form without remembering this:
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Marketing people are known for beliving their own lies.
Sales and marketing is often mostly bullshitting anyway. It also has a lot less risk and constraints associated to generated text having issues. Not surprised they were more on board. The tool is more fitting for those use cases anyway.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Like the guy with the carbon fiber submarine. Every engineer told him it couldn't be done, so he kept firing them until he had a staff of young, inexperienced engineers who would do what they were told, and just collect their paychecks.
Now their boss is dead, and there are no more paychecks.
load more comments
(2 replies)
A recent MIT report indicates that 95% of generative AI pilots fail to deliver measurable returns on investment, highlighting significant challenges in successfully implementing AI in businesses
CEOs:
“When I do it, it will be different.
OpenAI marketing > MIT analysis, apparently
load more comments
(1 replies)
He REALLY hates paying employees and wants their pennies in his treasure horde, we get it.
He will be shocked when he discovers the shareholders don't want to pay him, either. He'll be like "what?!?! AI doing MY job? This is a travesty!" and then they will have robot security drag him out of the building screaming.
“They ruthlessly cut costs, R&D, and employee benefits and then replace existing employees with overseas contractors. Innovation and growth take a back seat to sheer profitability.”
This is the operating manual that explains why IgniteTech’s much-publicized AI purge feels more like a familiar private-equity play.
[...]
IgniteTech is owned by ESW. For anyone who’s watched the ESW orbit, that vagueness is not accidental. ESW’s playbook, summarized in a long explanatory dossier that has circulated inside the industry, is blunt: buy distressed software, strip costs, move work to an hourly contractor model through a unit like Crossover (which has been described in Forbes as a “global software sweatshop”), and squeeze recurring revenue out of an existing customer base rather than invest in new products.
i was going to comment how this resembles PE firm tactics, thats probably his endgoal, and AI is just a convenient excuse.
Yeah this is called AI washing. Basically firing people, outsourcing all the jobs, stripping a company till there is nothing left. The goal is to maximize profits till the company is basically dead and then sell the husk. Because it's done under the AI label, customers and other interested parties see it as being innovative and not just money grabbing.
Its HOW pe FIRMS operate.
So they could have held paint drying Mondays instead, with the same overall effect
"Every single Monday was called Paint Dry Monday" Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could only watch paint dry. "You couldn't have customer calls; you couldn't work on budgets; you had to only watch paint dry." He said this happened across the board, not just for tech workers, but also for sales, marketing, and everybody else at IgniteTech. "That culture needed to be built. That was the key."
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
I wonder how many employees are working on automating the CEO there first
From the article:
Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the “most resistant,” he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn’t do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added.
Not surprising the people with technical skills that aren’t actually replaceable by LLMs would be against forced AI adoption. Good luck maintaining a code base created with vibe coding. Meanwhile the CEO probably looks at ChatGPT and realizes it could basically do everything he already does (write emails and make high level decisions without actually having to worry about their implementation) and then incorrectly thinks it’s the case for everyone else.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
What the fuck is IgniteTech?
An "enterprise-software powerhouse", allegedly. Basically they bought an AI startup and decided that this was their entire personality now.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The question I put to management is "What do you want me to use AI for?"
I can't get a consistent answer. Lots of stuff unrelated to my job duties. "Well, it's so easy to make Facebook ads!" - "You know that's not a thing I do, right?"
load more comments
(3 replies)
Nota bene: Not just laid off, replaced. With other people.
Basically spent a ton of money and talent and business disruption to turn over 80% of his workforce for shits and gigs.
that 80% adds profit to his pockets. thats whats hes really saying.
This is a paid promotion. Its one of the ones you pay an extra $1000 and they hide the sponsored tag.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This reads like a very weird AI circlejerk. They repeatedly mention that AI is the solution every company should adopt, but fail to provide a single example of succesful application. And I mean a how not a reult. They say 'company X KPI are this % better thanks to AI', but not how they applied it. Just talk of AI mindset, and 'culture' but I would have liked to understand what exactly it was used for (like agents, chatbots, automation of something in particular). It just reads like a lot of patting in the back and hot air so far, which is a pity because I would be interested in reading about real life cases of successful AI implementaiom
load more comments
(2 replies)
Claims Adjuster.
If this dickhead is so smart, why does he even need a staff? I’m sure he can go start a company all by himself with just AI to work for him.
load more comments
(2 replies)
"I am bad at managing my finances, and eventually need to get bailed out by the government, or end up next to the homeless guy I used to make fun of".
- This guy.
view more: next ›