echodot

FSD isn't perfect. No such system will ever be perfect. But, the goal isn't perfect, it just needs to be better than you.

Yeah people keep bringing that up as a counter arguement but I'm pretty certain humans don't swerve off a perfectly straight road into a tree all that often.

So unless you have numbers to suggest that humans are less safe than FSD then you're being equally obtuse.

Your saying this on a video where it drove into a tree and flipped over. There isn't time for a human to react, that's like saying we don't need emergency stops on chainsaws, the operator needs to just not drop it.

Actually that's something I don't understand, they think the moon is a sphere about 100 miles across about 1000 miles above the flat Earth. Why couldn't humans have flown that short distance?

Oh yeah the hanging up on you is really common. I would literally prefer a phone tree than having to talk to an AI because if what I wanted was something that would be simply explained to an AI, I would have done it myself on the website. The reason I'm calling is because I need someone with an actual brain, and in an understanding of the business, to use their brain to assist me with my somewhat complicated situation.

One time I got a credit card sent to my address that was for someone else. The letter was somehow addressed to me, but the credit card wasn't for me and I hadn't requested a credit card from this company. So I called the support line up and the stupid AI kept asking me for my customer ID. I told it I didn't have a customer ID because I wasn't a customer, and it said "thank you" and hung up on me. Fantastic.

In the end I had to call them out on Twitter in order to get in contact with a human.

I remain baffled every time I see support for this from "progressive" online spaces and voices

It's just people not using their brains, everything is just viewed at its surface level with no deeper analysis ever conducted. They are the sort of idiots that think that Starship Troopers is profascism.

Surely you cannot sue someone for future injuries where the future injuries are entirely unevidenced. There would have to be some kind of medical assessment that said that this kid is going to suffer ongoing injuries and I can't imagine they have such an assessment.

Maybe the counter argument should be that this kid's mom should attempt to get him on disability payments, and only if he's able to get on that, will they accept liability. There is zero chance of that happening.

Bet that kid is counting the days until he's legally an adult and can get away from her.

They are a right-wing religious advocacy group. So it's practically a guarantee.

The group has also campaigned against sex trafficking, same-sex marriage, sex shops and sex toys

So they just did a control + f for "sex" and then are against any of the results. Are they seriously suggesting that there are people out there who are all for sex trafficking, and would vote in favour of it? They sound like lovely people.

I don't know why they bother censoring it we all know he's called Quentin.

I think you're giving more credit to the conservatives than most of them are actually worthy of. I'm sure there was some political machinations somewhere by someone but a lot of the conservatives genuinely thought that this would be an improvement.

You're not telling me that the likes of Bad Enoch are in on some kind of grand conspiracy.

Oh come on, that's not an original take, that's literally what everyone who voted for remain kept trying to tell the Brexiteers. It was so obvious that this was never going to work, it so clearly hadn't been thought through.

The way politics in this country is handled is like constantly trying to stop a toddler from setting themselves on fire or drinking bleach. Supposedly level-headed career politicians make the most obviously stupid of decisions. It's maddening.