this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
563 points (99.6% liked)

News

34120 readers
3661 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least four leaders of the Civil Rights Division resigned because the section's head, Harmeet Dhillon, decided not to investigate shooting of Renee Good.

Top leaders of the criminal section of the Civil Rights Division have left their jobs to register their frustration with the department after the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon decided not to investigate the ICE officer’s fatal shooting of Renee Good last week.

The criminal section of the division would normally investigate any fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer and specializes in probing potential or alleged abuse or improper use of force by law enforcement.

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like suing the government under this administration does not do anything because the current federal government rules with an iron fist. they have proven time and time and time again they do not care what laws or the constitution say.

In a sane world where law is respected, yes, I agree with everything you are saying. however, we live in an age where logic and the rule of law do not prevail. i feel their radical actions will catch up to them eventually, but at what cost? what if they do something that ends my life? I won't be able to enjoy when justice is eventually served...

currently, if someone is in a position of power and they have integrity, they should be holding onto that position for dear life while they weather this storm. the alternative leaves corruption to fill these vacant jobs with someone who has no integrity, in my opinion.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Doesn't do anything? Have you been ignoring the news?

Know what, no here.

https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/

Looks like litigation is doing something.

Or if you want a more reputable source:

https://apnews.com/projects/trump-executive-order-lawsuit-tracker/

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

People here don't like reading about the power our legal system has, they want to see drama and world wrestling stageplay. They want to imagine we're going to have a glorious people's liberation movement with molotov cocktails and guillotines. Everyone is the same, everyone rather escape into kayfabe.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's this same kind of romanticized attitude on the right honestly. "Just violence yourself into the right type of government!"

The French are successful because they seem to have a governance style built around the overthrowing of an elected fascist every decade or so, since the late-1700s. Like a magna carte blanche.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly, it's more kayfabe but on the left. It's people who rather indulge in a storyline than get active in their community and start fixing things structurally by like, working to elect actual representation for their communities and states.

My problem with America's leftists who want to violence their way to a better world is that in this country we don't even have experience doing that kind of thing, we don't have a plan, and nobody can give me a follow-through for what will happen if we magically end up with our glorious socialist leader who overthrows the government.

What about the millions of people we live next to who didn't vote for or ask for a coup? What about the military who are not only the largest and most powerful fighting force in the world, but are dedicated to protecting the seat of power in the US? Who exactly are we going to depose? All of congress and senate? What about their aides? What about the various departments and cabinets? Do we have people lined up to run the new government? Or are we gonna raw-dog it like they did in Nepal?

I strongly feel most people have ZERO idea the scale of such things and amount of coordination and planning involved in the kinds of fantasy plans the average lemmy lefty indulges in.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I see comments like that either calling for Trump to be deposed, or yeah, a full on civil war against Republicans at that point. The second is from people who can view chess only a few more moves in advance than those saying the first and know that we have a presidential line of succession and it's just as bad all the way down. But both are extremely naive views because this is a cultural problem with Republicans as a whole. Even if somehow you were to Thanos snap every Republican in power, the next election cycle will be just as bad, if not worse.

To fix, you have to address the militant individualism thats been romanticized by billionaires; the only thing that seems to have tricked down from them, who's only purpose is to get people to vote to lower taxes, but mainly benefit the rich. Democrats should start running on lowering or cutting taxes out right for anyone making less than 350k, and watch the cognitive dissonance happen with the hard core Rs who made their whole identity about not getting taxed.

Then we continue to build up our communities and homesteading hobbies and primary any Democrat who gives an inch to these fascists.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Then we continue to build up our communities and homesteading hobbies and primary any Democrat who gives an inch to these fascists.

I really support this. We lost the reins when we checked out of our local communities and stopped looking at our local council leaders, judges, sheriffs and of course mayors and governors with the same scrutiny as we fixed on the annual 4-year WWE EXTREME federal election spectacle.

If we held them to the same standards and created a foundation of people who actually represent us, it would be far, far harder for the higher elected officials to walk all over us. And it's far easier to actually make changes to your community, it's actually doable to recall people in power in your state! Many state congress people often run uncontested as well, and if we paid attention to these situations we could mount opposition or even oppose them ourselves.

The thing that worries me is that so many are so cynical that they can't feel engaged with the often boring and even cringey state of local politics, and will invent reasons in their head to avoid involvement because it feels far, far less rewarding than complaining on the internet to people who will give you upvotes. I feel like this goes hand-in-hand with the social isolation that we've allowed to fester on both sides.

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I really have to thank my wife as it's been a recent change for me, I was pretty isolationist. She's been a "townie" all her life and since moving in almost 8 years ago, I've started to really see the benefits of community, like farmers markets and such.

I think the best thing for people is to get active in their local community and politics. My brother was pretty conservative going back a long while; mainly about wanting lower or no taxes. He then ran for and won his HOA presidency and quickly realized how fucked they would be if they just got rid of their HoA fees. They needed to dredge their lake but the previous administration signed in a bilaw stating they couldn't raise the fees. They didn't have the money for it outright, nor could they pay back a loan. He didn't run again, but I'd like to think he learn a valuable lesson about public service that day, and the effort it takes to run a community.

So I've been protesting any company that's publicly traded. Had the same cell phone since 2019. Moving funds into a credit union. Cooking meals at home. On the rare occasion we eat out it's at a locally owned restaurant. Buying our produce at the farmers market and growing some of our own. For the stuff we can't avoid, getting bulk items from Costco until we can source better AND local. And then socials, getting rid of all the major ones and switching to the fediverse.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

They're just as stupid as magats. How are they going to fight the most powerful military on the planet, with the largest police state backing that military up?

That is not going to happen. I'm sick of these keyboard agitators everywhere trying to stir up violence. That's exactly what this regime wants. And if shit hits the fan you know none of these cowards will walk the walk. It's so easy to bitch about what other people should be doing from the comfort of your home.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

to clarify my statement: in my opinion, the wheels of justice are turning too slowly for a president that wakes up, waves a wand, and gets what he wants. his actions have real consequences for real Americans.

just last week, 10 billion dollars for child care was halted for states that are not republican. the effects malnourished children have every day they go hungry may last a lifetime.... and im just supposed to wait for the litigation you posted to get things sorted out? unacceptable.

I have no doubt the law is accurately tracking and will get things done, but the wait doesnt work for people that depend on social services

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yes. I agree on that. But it's what we have. And it's exactly why they move fast and break things.

They're hoping to demoralize the American public to get further power.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

I agree it is what we have as well, but there has got to be a better faster way to clean this mess up that isn't violent.

demoralization is working too, and its the only thing I have 100% control of, but I just cant give in.

im sure everyone's social circle thats reading this has at least one person they know who only works to divide minds instead of unite them, and its absolutely draining.

OK im off my soapbox for awhile, thanks for the conversation... I feel better lol

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

You're proving the point that the courts work: just after DHHS blocked TANF funds to five Democratic states, a judge blocked it with a TRO:

A federal judge in New York temporarily blocked the Trump administration from freezing roughly $10 billion in federal funding for child care and social services destined for five Democratic-led states, keeping funds flowing until a lawsuit against the government can progress. . . . The decision came less than a day after the five states targeted by the Trump administration — New York, California, Minnesota, Illinois and Colorado — filed a lawsuit arguing that the freeze could create havoc among families with young children.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/09/us/politics/trump-child-care-funding-freeze.html

Outside SCOTUS the courts are holding, and moving quickly where warranted. You could easily have linked this information yourself, but chose not to. Stop spreading misinformation.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You could easily have linked this information yourself, but chose not to. Stop spreading misinformation.

?

I didnt choose not to post a link, do not make invalid assumptions when you know nothing about me.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not an invalid assumption, it's fact that you included only doomer, outdated news in order to support your wrong conclusion either a) without bothering to check to see if your information was correct, or b) you knew but decided not to mention it.

If you don't like false accusations then don't make them. I know that I have zero respect for that approach to posting, and between that and the lazy doomering that's enough of you for me to know. Blocked, bye.