this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
178 points (98.9% liked)

United Kingdom

5743 readers
195 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I wouldn't normally post Times articles but they seem to be the first to run this bit of rare good news.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I genuinely don't understand everyone complaining about u-turns. Setting aside that this isn't really a u-turn, they're still doing it, just won't be mandatory.

Would you rather a government that dogmatically sticks to every single idea they have regardless of public opinion, or a government that changes its policies in response to feedback?

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My issue is the government coming up with ideas that everyone can see from the outset are doomed to fail, for seemingly arbritray reasons, and then rolling them back when the inevitable happens.

Winter fuel being the most glaring: we need to show the banks we're fiscally responsible, we then have no material change in how the banks view the government but have a minor shift in the forecasts for 5 years time, we've done it, we're fiscally responsible now so pensioners can have their £500 back.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Since 2008 the banks themselves have had to prove they are fiscally responsible which I very doubt they are.

[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I'd rather they did better in the first place too. But I'm not going to complain when they finally do the right thing. That's just going to lead to them not changing unpopular policies at all.