this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
42 points (90.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38148 readers
1136 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You have the "1D" political compass of left vs right, but those terms are so broad they can describe completely opposite viewpoints. Then there's the "2D" political compass with authoritarian/libertarian and the classic left/right, but that is still quite broad and doesn't fit every ideology and belief well. If someone were to create a fully fleshed out N-dimensional political compass that could ~~accurately summarise~~ generalise to a reasonable degree of accuracy* a person's political perspective, how many axes are needed, and what would they be?

Of the top of my head, I can think of a few:

  • authoritarian vs anti-authoritarian (on the extremes, you would have dictator bootlickers who support a one-rules-all style system and anarchists advocating for no authority at all)
  • internationalism vs nationalism
  • egalitarianism vs traditionalism (social equality vs hierarchal society)
  • environmentalist vs anti-environmentalist (every policy must consider environmental impacts vs cLiMaTe ChAnGe Is A hOaX)
  • progressive vs conservative (or pro-change vs anti-change)
  • intellectualism vs anti-intellectualism (pro-science vs anti-science)
  • free vs regulated economy (on the extremes, no government influence of the economy at all and a state-run economy)

Please don't treat this as an argument over why your politics are better! Debating politics is the worst kind of internet argument one can consume themselves into...

Also, please note that this post is not intended to attack anyone with the above viewpoints. Just want to make that clear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

How about something about supporting the people who are poor, unemployed, or sick? Socialists and leftists love it, while right-wing capitalists hate it. I don’t know how to phrase it concisely like you did.

And then there's also the classic socialist-capitalist debate about worker rights. So employee rights could be another axis. Should the owner just exploit the workers or do the workers get to have weekends off, 8 h workdays, various vacations, safe working environment, fair wages etc.

Oh, and then there are various language based divisions too. There are entire parties dedicated to supporting specific language groups, but I guess you could summarize it as "support of minority language groups". How about just lumping all minority groups into a single axis? How about something like: minority rights vs. majority? Nowadays, that includes sexual and gender minorities too.

How about city vs. rural life? Not too many decades ago, farming was a big part of life, so there were also many farmers who voted. Hence, we had farmer parties, and we still do to some extent. Now that farming is mostly automated, not that many voters care about farming. It's just another industry, just like steel, paper or electronics. Historically speaking, city. vs rural life was definitely a political axis. Nowadays, not so much.

In any case, it's a really complicated topic, so we're going to need a lot of dimensions. Your suggestions are a good start. Just add a few more, and eventually you have enough. If you're really technical about it, each and every question is a new dimension, but if you should group them together into broader topics. That way, you're definitely going to end up in at least 20 dimensions.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

we had farmer parties

Agrarian parties still exist in most actual democracies, in some countries they even have a significant presence in their parliament. Nowadays they are mostly about the farmers thinking they should be allowed to completely destroy the environment that sustain their farms in the name of short term profits.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm. So nowadays that ideology should probably be lumped together with “corporate greed vs. sensible thinking” -axis to keep the number of dimensions reasonable.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

They are not corporate per-se, the bulk are small farmers that through a mix of conservatism and short sighted self-interest think the rest of the people should give them massive subsidies for the privilege of destroying what's left of the ecosystem. The greedy suits play a part by keeping the internal propaganda machine well oiled and financed, but they are not the ones dumbing cow shit on the steps of government buildings for the right to wipe out Europe's last forests for example.