this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
11 points (86.7% liked)

Vancouver

1768 readers
20 users here now

Community for the city of Vancouver, BC

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
TruckBC@lemmy.ca
spoctoss@lemmy.ca
11
Video promoting $2,000 rent for 200-square-foot Vancouver apartment widely criticized (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 2 years ago by villasv@lemmy.ca to c/vancouver@lemmy.ca
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I searched for the article shown during the video in the article: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-bylaws-limiting-sro-rent-increases-between-tenancies-quashed-1.6543413

(Aug 05, 2022) A ruling issued this week by Justice Karen F. Douglas found that the city, under its Vancouver Charter, does not have the authority to set how a property owner changes rent for what are also known as SROs — single room occupancy housing — when a tenant moves out, because of conflicts with the provincial Residential Tenancy Act.

Now I'm onto researching what is the point of an SRO then. If there's no pricing control, it's just an acronym for micro apartments...? That can't be.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

https://vancouver.ca/people-programs/single-room-accommodation-bylaw.aspx

The SRA Bylaw prevents the loss of low-income housing and the displacement of tenants in Vancouver's Downtown core. Single room accommodation includes single room occupancy hotels (SRO), rooming houses, and non-market housing with rooms less than 320 square feet. The bylaw prevents tenant displacement and the loss of this housing stock by regulating its alteration, conversion, and demolition.

Okay, so the only thing that SROs have going for them in terms of regulation is that altering, converting, or demolishing SRAs requires a permit. Non-profit SROs can apply for grants, but private SROs can just treat it as a regular rental property. That's totally different from what I had in mind for what an SRA program should be if they were really aiming to prevent displacement. And it's even worse that the city actually made it with rent control legislation, and it was taken down by the province. Infuriating.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Looks like another example of sham regulation designed to appease the people while actually supporting the rich.