this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
465 points (99.2% liked)
Political Memes
11192 readers
2492 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wait what
I saw some interview with a woman who said she was witness to this happening, a survivor. Not sure if it was true so I want to know.
I'm very much lost on the context of this and the meme. We talking Hillary? Shes been accused of this, or the survivor knew Hillary witnessed it???
Talking Hillary, yeah. I saw a clip on Instagram where this lady was participating in a remote interview, and she was making these claims that I said in the first comment I made here. I wasn't able to find it again unfortunately. But there are rumor articles online of it, too.
I just... have a really hard time picturing Hillary participating in something like that. She just seems like a sweet old lady to me, but at this point I can't rule anyone out. That's one of the scary parts in all of this. Everything needs to be investigated, I feel.
Hillary seems like a sweet old lady to you? She seems like a power-hungry ghoul to me.
Alright. I don't know Hillary at all. I'm not based in America.
A good rule of thumb is that when something sounds unbelievable you should assume that the source is made up until you locate substantial evidence to confirm the claim. Nowadays, video clips are misrepresented or even fabricated altogether. If this particular claim had been spread far at all and a few days had passed, there would be articles online (at non-junk websites) discussing it. I'm not seeing any such articles in this case.
My personal rule is not to mention such "big unverifiable claim" topics until I'm able to verify and educate myself on it. That avoids me feeling silly by being unable to respond to any probing questions about the big claim. It also avoids spreading the idea that the story is accurate. If all I can say is "I saw it in a feed full sourced from publishers that I don't necessarily trust" and the claim is unbelievably wild that's my "stop signal".
I mean, that's the normal way of processing of claims before the Epstein files. Even Bill Gates turns up and he had to apologize to his co-workers for the things revealed about him. And he seemed like a relatively chill guy to me as well. Everyone is involved. Even the princess of Norway. This is far and wide.