this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
101 points (88.5% liked)

Privacy

9143 readers
398 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Payments are very different. Any company is required to keep track of their finances, the tax authorities don't fuck around. If you electronically pay for something and expect anonymity, you are not very, um, educated. If you feel like you need their paid plans, pay cash and only ever access it through TOR running Tails. I feel like that's a reasonable level of opsec for most activists.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

You know that, I know that, people here probably know that.

But out in the real world where people are doing real world activism and are concerned about real world problems, they don't necessarily know that. They are concerned about a whole lot of things that are not digital infrastructure and technology.

They should be able to trust a service that promises security and anonymity for payment. In particular one that is touted as well renowned.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago

Seeing this comment downvoted in a privacy community is a little disheartening.

Comments like "If you electronically pay for something and expect anonymity, you are not very, um, educated" is technically true in a descriptive sense maybe, but in a prescriptive sense, the comment tells us "You should have known what were know. You didn't, and you deserve what you got for that."

It seems unhelpful to assume our knowledge is automatically universal, and not a result of some combination of luck and circumstance.