this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
677 points (92.9% liked)

hmmm

7871 readers
1399 users here now

For things that are "hmmm".

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Not buying it: How would you charge (generator) and discharge (motor) the car at the same time? The electronics and software is designed to only charge the battery when parked. My car won't even shift into gear if it's plugged in.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I mean, this one is fake, but there is a company creating haluers that do pretty much this. Have a small battery they recharge with a generator. According to them, a generator is a lot more efficient and enviromentaly friendly compared to normal engine, since it runs at constant rpm.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Name and (the opposite of) shame!

You're talking about Edison Motors, right?

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yes, but I couldn't recall the name. Thanks for mentioning it.

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Actually, the constant RPM ones are less efficient, the inverter generators that are able to vary with the load that are more efficient. But yes, they are better at turning the fuel into usable power. Traditional ice engines lose something like 40% of the power made just in Losses from gearing transmission axel etc. So while it may seem silly technically using a generator to charge an EV is more efficient

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

FWIW, people have made a real working version of this concept before.