this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
75 points (98.7% liked)

196

19195 readers
171 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Although modern politics has changed things, rednecks have historically been anti authority and pro labor. Building a rural/urban alliance like Bill Clinton did would genuinely create an entirely new era of politics that would be friendly to liberal leftist ideologies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I completely agree with you and disagree with the dismissal of some of the other comments. I grew up in South Carolina and worked in factories for years. I've met a lot of rednecks of all types. There's this weird tendency on the left to associate rural people with backwards mindsets which is just straight up classist IMO.

Most of them have felt politically abandoned by neoliberal policies sending their jobs overseas and politicians courting city-dwellers. Trump told them he wasn't going to abandon them, that he was going to bring back factory jobs, that elites in business and government have been giving them a raw deal. I can't blame them for taking a chance on Trump when the alternatives were career politicians giving them more of the same. People like to pretend that rural voters aren't voting in their best interest but they knew Kamala, Biden, or Clinton weren't going to do shit for them. South Carolina is filled with small "historic downtowns" that are clearly 50 years past their prime. They've seen what the status quo does.

The good news is more of them are seeing trump for what he is. I know this from actual rednecks telling me this. These people are anti-establishment, anti-government, and often pro-union. I really don't think it would take much to swing them left. The one sticking point is...

Racism is still very much a thing among rednecks. Most have lived a blue collar life and developed a thick skin. As a result, they see "woke" stuff as a bunch of soft people who never really worked demanding everybody cater to them rather than deal with life like they did. Nobody is irredeemable and many of them are quirky weirdos in their own way. I worked with this old trump voter redneck that used to DJ and introduced me to Baby Metal. Another kept a my little pony figurine zip tied to his toolbox. My brother had trouble making friends in high school until he met the rednecks. He later told me "if nobody will accept you, the rednecks will accept you." There is capacity to accept people not like them.

IMO, a politician running on a platform of economic left-wing populism would run the rural ballot. Literally rework Trump's "drain the swamp" narrative except actually mean it. And actually follow through. Invest in rural communities. Go after corruption which is huge in rural areas. Actually listen to their concerns and address them rather than dismissing them. Any worker can be an ally in the working class struggle.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly! Rural areas have been being shit on and neglected for longer than I've been alive. Things just continue on a slow methodical downward spiral with no end in site. At this point people just want literally anything to change. Yes trump draws a lot of racists and biggots for obvious reasons. But for a lot of the folk I know who voted for him who aren't otherwise raging assholes it was more the equivalent of someone lashing out when cornered. They knew Kamala wouldn't do anything for them but they didn't know what trump would do so they went with trump. Those folks now almost universally regret that choice but I'm willing to bet they will make the same choice again if the DNC keeps running do nothing establishment goons. They'll vote for anyone who believably prommises to change things regardless of of the changes because as most of those folks see it things couldn't possibly get worse for them so any change at all is at least a chance of things getting better. That thinking is obvously wrong but the DNC also hasn't given them any decent candidates since Obama who just so happened to win 2 terms.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 1 day ago

They'll vote for anyone who believably prommises to change things regardless of of the changes because as most of those folks see it things couldn't possibly get worse for them so any change at all is at least a chance of things getting better

This is the reason a lot of people who identify as leftists told Me that they were choosing to vote neutral. They believed that a vote for Kamala was more of the same, and they were willing to risk a Trump presidency to shake things up. They still believe that things haven't gotten worse since 2024.