this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
518 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82669 readers
3303 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

No, you've got a point... Actually you're right. To an extent.

I should have qualified my post.

But I'd argue the "bad" part of SEO is just too tempting. It's clearly winning out, across the entire internet, unless you can look at me with a straight face and say "Google search is fine." Or that discoverability of genuine services is fine. It's definitely not; it's a miracle any legitimate business is surviving from web search anymore, amongts the sea of attention scams and corporate behemoths.

In other words, the I feel like the "honeymoon" where we could trust SEO to happen ethically is now behind us.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You also have a point. HOW DARE WE AGREE. :)

Well, except that I think that - to a decent extent - the changing requirements for SEO generally have still improved it. I'm comparing to the days of keyword stuffing, which doesn't work anymore, for example. Nowadays, it does have to be text that flows and is somewhat natural.

THAT said, I will myself point to recipe sites that give you a novel before the recipe for SEO purposes. I'm certainly not saying it's perfect by any means.'

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The results are awful though. Over the past few years, I can hardly even think of a single search where SEO quickly brought me to "the page I was looking for"; searches end in either a wall of spam, or me getting frustrated and more directly finding what I already know I want. Smaller sites I used to love have withered and died, buried from the lack of earnest traffic. Malicious URLs rise above the businesses they are copying.

In other words, what does it matter if SEO is "improved" if the results are junk? It's clearly not working better, unless one's a scammer, or a corporation that benefits from the consolidation.

[–] MinoriMirariRProductions@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree with this statement whole heartily.