I mean, one has literally millions of scientists and decades, if not centuries of established, peer-reviewed literature... and the other is a random stranger online who believes Charlie Kirk wasn't shot for being a massive right-wing cunt, but "as the first victim of the war on Iran."

Geez, that's a tough one. Couldn't possibly decide which way I'm leaning.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I’m calling it as a smooth sharks situation

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Edit: I'm an idiot.

[–] hector@lemmy.today -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't give a fuck what you think. But I trust that the experts do not have all the answers which has never been wrong up until this point in time. But no you're the smart one here.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But no you're the smart one here.

Compared to you? Yes, I am.

If I had 1€ for everytime some cognitively limited champ says "well the scientists don't know everything", I'd have enough to buy a sufficient quantity of alcohol to forget I ever heard such bs.

That's the core of science. Knowing you don't know everything. If at any point someone in fact says they know everything, they've gone from a scientist to a religious lunatic.

No-one gives a fuck what you think. That's why we read CERN and not your comments when we wish to stay informed on what's going on in physics.