this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
153 points (95.3% liked)
Technology
82621 readers
3052 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Reading through the study, not all samples contained unsafe levels of those chemicals. It's interesting to note how many brand-name over-ear and in-ear headphones do, though, including products by Apple, Bose, Samsung and Sony.
Unfortunately, none of the headphones I own were on the list. The only IEMs they test are the KZ EDX, which do ok.
After searching the PDF, I only saw Apple listed for one product, and didn’t see any instances where it wasn’t “green”, so I’m not sure how clickbaity the article is (since I didn’t read the article itself)
"safe" level does not mean ineffective level. Maybe its not danger to health but it can still cause something bad. Maybe it accumulates in time, maybe it cases changes in the body that cause something slight that you wouldnt even think to link to this.