this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
53 points (94.9% liked)
AskUSA
1221 readers
65 users here now
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:
- !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
- !asklemmy@lemmy.world
- !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
- !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
- !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
- !uspolitics@lemmy.world
- !politics@piefed.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pretty much every American fast food chain from the 80s and 90s has enshittified.
A new crop has come up that's more similar to the old quality of those places, Chipotle, Five Guys, etc.
But even Chipotle went a good bit downhill.
Of course this all varies by location. Once in awhile you find a location where the workers and/or owners actually care a bit, and you catch a glimpse of what these are supposed to be.
Hot take: American fast food chains haven't gotten worse. Actually, the quality of their food and the atmosphere have generally gotten significantly better in the past decade or so.
The difference is that now you are an adult, and you aren't as enthralled by a cheap, bland cheeseburger as you were when you were 8. Your fond memories of going to the fast food joint with your friends in high school are fond because you are remembering formative memories, not because the food was actually good. You enjoyed stopping at the fast food restaurant as a young parent because it provided a brief respite from the demands of taking care of a young child. You think Taco Bell tastes like garbage now not because Taco Bell has gotten worse, but because Chipotle has raised your expectations for what food should taste like.
Honestly, the trend of pining for the fast food days gone by feels pretty cringe to me. Like, c'mon, are you really gonna look at me with a straight face and tell me that McDonalds in the 80s really cared deeply about making children happy? That Taco Bell was respecting their customers' high culinary expectations when they introduced Mountain Dew Baja Blast and the Doritos Locos Taco? That back in the day when the staff at TGI Fridays came out and sang happy birthday to you, they really meant it?
No!!! None of that was ever true, lol. These are giant, soulless corporations completely geared towards maximizing profits, run by stressed out managers and pissed off employees, and they always have been.
What actually happened is that Americans got higher standards. They became more knowledgeable and worldly and adventurous. Their expectations for the taste and health of the food they ate grew. 20 years ago in middle america, few people had ever eaten Thai or Indian food. Sushi was exotic and dangerous. Eating a salad for lunch made you a health nut at best, but more likely identified you as "probably a homo". Olive Garden was actually considered a good place to take a date. We changed. We got better. This is a good thing.
I'm going to tell you that the corporate culture of enshittifying everything wasn't in full swing yet. Olive Garden was on par with Texas Roadhouse or a little nicer than current Outback Steakhouse. McDonald's was pretty much in line with current Chipotle. Pizza Hut was more like Edwardos or a decent sit-down pizza chain.
What I'm getting from your spiel is that you're young. Sushi was not exotic and dangerous in 2006. Your salad example is probably from the 70s.
I dunno man, maybe I'm just 2middleamerica4u. 2006 was exactly the era when sushi was exotic and dangerous.
Literally.
Watchdog is reporting that they tested 30 fast-food locations to see if fecal bacteria was found in any of them, and the results are alarming. Out of all the 30 restaurants, fecal coliform bacteria was found on at least three McDonald’s, six Burger King, and seven KFC locations in the United Kingdom. Not only that, but most of the samples taken from Burger King and KFC contained “significant levels” of bacteria.
I feel like this is an unfair hot take.
For one thing, these can only be considered American restaraunts in that the branding originated in the US. The companies are global corporations. And this article is talking specifically about restaurants in the UK. These brands have different corporate offices in each country they operate in, with these offices doing things like modifying recipies to appeal to local tastes, sourcing ingredients from local supply chains, and complying with local regulations. And each location is operated as an independent franchise - most likely owned by someone who lives in the country. So, the branding of the cartoon clown is American - but these are restaurants owned by Brits with British workers, with British corporate oversight, sourcing British ingredients under British food safety regulations. They are British restaurants.
For another, I doubt this is a phenomenon unique to US-branded fast food restaurants in the UK. It is true to say "independent testing found fecal bacteria in ice at some McDonalds locations." But it is disingenuous to imply that this is an issue specifically with McDonalds without performing similar testing at the British-branded fast food chain next store, the kebab cart on the next street corner, or a random person's kitchen. And to claim that the restaurants have literally gotten shittier over time, you would also need to cite data on similar testing done at a previous time.
Really, the truth is that there are fecal bacteria just about everywhere - go test literally any doorknob, or ask any of your friends to test their phones. Or go test your toothbrush... for real. Yes, the world is covered in poop. Sorry. It is honestly completely unsurprising that some of it will end up in your food. You've probably been consuming it for years with basically every meal you've eaten.
But if you are concerned about the actual risk of getting sick from eating at any given restaurant, then large corporate chains are actually probably one of the safest bets. McD's has a global reputation to protect, has a long history of dealing with health code violation PR, and knows they have a target on their backs. Everyone wants McDonalds to be a dirty disgusting place to eat that constantly violates the health code so that they can talk shit about them. So McDonalds and other corporate fast food chains make a significant effort to make sure that they actually are clean and that people don't get sick and they don't get health code violations. Which squares with what every fast food restaurant employee I've ever met has told me - they might not like working at McDonalds, but they will aggressively tell you that they absolutely strictly follow food safety standards to an annoying degree. Compare this to Billy's Burger Joint, run by Billy, an overworked independent restaurant owner, keeping his dream alive with sheer grit, sleep deprivation, and child labor. Without corporate overlords demanding by-the-book compliance, and under the pressure of serving customers quickly and staying in the black, Billy is much more likely to fudge things like not staying on top of the ice machine cleaning schedule or serving burger patties that are a day or two past their marked expiration date.
I'm not saying I like these fast food chains, or that you should eat at them. Personally, McDonalds gives me a headache whenever I eat it. And they're and evil corporation. But if your reason for not eating there is because you fear fecal bacteria in your food, you should probably go live in a clean room, not just avoid McDs.
I'm wondering what that same test would reveal about the average US household kitchen?
And, yes, I understand that a commercial restaurant should be held to a higher standard than my grandma's kitchen. I'm curious, though, because I've seen a LOT of nasty kitchens in my time...