this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
1094 points (92.4% liked)
Political Memes
11447 readers
3806 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Republicans also really love when you vote third party.
Only if you were going to vote Democrat.
Republicans hate republican voters going 3rd party.
Which is why the Republicans are directly helping the Green Party. Because every vote for the Green Party is one less vote for Democrats. Should give you a hint about who voting third party helps.
that's indirect "help"
So the title is
Seems pretty direct to me, right?
but they could not work directly with the campaign. Stein had no control over the messaging
And what does that difference matter?
they weren't directly helping her
that's not true. many people would vote for a green candidate but would never vote for a war party candidat.
Well, enjoy your Iran war, after refusing to vote for Kamela Harris. Harris would not have invaded Iran.
you can't know that
You can, though.
no, it's impossible to prove a nonfactual
Do you say that to the people who are saying Harris would have done the same things that Trump is doing, or is that only a response to people saying it’s blatantly fucking obvious that she wouldn’t? Sounds like cope to me.
we can't know what would have happened if she had won because she didn't win.
I don't see anyone saying she would have invaded iran, though, so I've never had the opportunity to educate such a person on the unprovableness of nonfactuals
We can.
We can know that she wouldn’t have the same administration who have been doing this shit. You can make some logical deductions that if we didn’t have Hegseth and the heritage foundation pulling all the strings with no consequences for their actions that things would, inarguably, not be happening as they are now. We can be sure the Venezuela and Cuba shit wouldn’t be happening. There are plenty of things that we absolutely can guarantee would not be happening, it just requires you to pull your head out of your ass.
this does not give us access to an alternate reality in which kamal won. it's just storytelling. there is no evidence for it because there can be no evidence for it.
Trump apparently took the decision to go to war against Iran ignorant of the Iranian threat to close the Hormuz straight. Even I knew Iran would do that.
The whole reason to go to war with Iran was to stop the Iranian nuclear program... which Trump himself cancelled Obama's deal to stop.
Harris would not have been Bibi's little bitch.
There is no reason to think that Harris would have gone to war with Iran.
this isn't proof. it's story telling
A democracy should be about voting for what you believe is the best course of action, and not to meta game the system. The system breaks when people think like this "if I don't vote for the other option my vote doesn't count".
Sup? I'm here to remind you that you don't live in a perfect reality and never will.
It doesn't matter what SHOULD be. It matters what IS.
If you want to vote 3rd party in local/state elections to try to help build their influence and get more than ZERO of their members in Congress, that's great. But if you vote 3rd party in a presidential election when a 3rd party stands exactly NO chance of winning, then you are a fool who is throwing your vote away and acknowledging that you're fine with the worst case scenario happening.
To be clear, the 3rd party candidate with the most votes in the 2024 presidential election only got 0.5% of the total votes cast. Proving that there is no reality in which a 3rd party candidate wins the presidency.
I could have voted for Jeff Goldblum for president, cuz I think he's a cool guy. But that would have been pretty stupid, wouldn't it?
Solution is to abolish first-past-the-post first. Not to ignore mathematics and pretend reality does not exist.