this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
1007 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83150 readers
3377 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Using CRISPR-Cas9, scientists engineered a yeast to produce the nutrient feed. Farmers could have it in two years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That is awesome news BUT

The real reason is humanity being a bunch of irresponsible greedy fuckwads, and I fear that this will be used not in the "let's be less greedy, let's fix the problems and let's use this to help the bees" but more as a "woohoo, bee factory farming!" and "W00T, this means we can fuck over bees even more, let's go!"

Can we please stop it with the greed?

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago

Exact same thing I thought. Honey bees are actively harmful for the environment because they outcompete wild bees who are less efficient at pollination whilst being actively exploited for their honey. While improving their diet is certainly a net benefit for the bees, at the end of the day it just reads to me like farmers have more efficient workers to harvest more honey and exploit even more.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Greed is incentivized both neurologically and economically. You cannot count on all of humanity rewiring their brain. We must destroy the economic incentives and then work on countering the neurological component.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I dont think this is very true. How do you explain that 99.99% of people are super happy living their lives with just enough money to have somewhere to live and pay for food and some vehicle?

To me it seems that we have like 0.0001% of the population being super greedy and mentally ill, and they are the ones being talked about in the media and the ones turning Earth into a shitty place because of their enormous greed and lust for power.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt we can remove the neurological component, let alone without it fucking up. Greed is an abstraction of our old survival instincts since as a general rule the tribe, clan, village or whatever would counter the worst effects. The end goal should be to reimplement those social control mechanisms, what that looks like is probably regulation's and maybe beating some folks over the head with a 2x4.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe we can steer the neurological component to focus on activity that offers positive benefits to society, like art. Substitute something good for something bad. It just takes a bit of time for the brain to find the satisfaction it used to get from greed in a different behavior, like music, or exercise.

We can always gun for glory through selfless action, still selfish reasons but good results.

[–] NaNin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

Our technology is great, but our policy is horrendous. We need to change our politics to change the world for the better

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

explain how one would we or us stop it with the greed

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It's a bit extreme, but I say we kill all billionaires and then fairly redistribute their cash and see what happens.
If there's no real change in greed then kill the top 0.1% of wealth hoarders and see what happens.

At some point the greed will have to stop.

[–] azureskypirate@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bioengineer some humans to not be greedy. 

Some humans because you can opt out, or you can choose it for your designer baby. Then there is a control and an experimental group.

The mad scientist in me is dying to see whether behaviors with moral connotations (greed) confer an advantage for survival.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] group_hug@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Funny thing, seems like all the billionaires are all for eugenics.

In fact they are pro anything that brings them more wealth and power whether it be destroying the planet or destroying the human race (Thiel) or destroying the night sky (Musk)

[–] azureskypirate@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

licks fingers and wets eyebrows 

Hahah! An unethical study to quantify the survival value of ethics! Isaac Newton would agree that experiments are a necessity!

An economst's natural experiment, hehe! oh Adam Smith, when does self interest become greed?