this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
980 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83150 readers
3469 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Using CRISPR-Cas9, scientists engineered a yeast to produce the nutrient feed. Farmers could have it in two years.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 4 points 40 minutes ago

"Scientists synthesize nutrients Bees no longer get because humans destroyed all the flowers, and we think this is a net good."

[–] Itwasntme223@discuss.online 10 points 3 hours ago

Spouse and I work every year to add native plants and flowers back around our host to give the bees a place to go. Anything to save these amazing, little polinaters.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Humans: oh sure, let's not change our insane agricultural system that is the major killer of biodiversity but instead create yet another technonfix by now in 2026™ fiddeling with the genes of another species.

When will we finally learn: there are no technological solutions to 'manage' the living. The living is not 'manageable'./We've tried this approach pretty much since 100 years and every one 'solution' created two new problems. Look where we are guys, our planet is FUCKED. 50 years ago it was DDT, now it's Crispr-CAS9...

1000 likes for this celebration of technical human dominance, we're doing quite right, do we? Not our 'dysfunctional' ecosystem is the problem, but our approach to it that is based on control and (technoligical) dominance, instead of humility and respect.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 39 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Get rid of the large swaths of green fucking grass, which completely useless when one cuts it down. Let the Dandy Lions grow like we do in Europe and plant more native flowers too.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Let the Dandy Lions grow like we do in Europe

No, Dandy Lions crowd out native North American species and result in less diverse ecosystems, which is bad.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I have a native meadow lawn and it's awesome. Zero maintenance, barely any watering (just peak dry season) and incredibly beautiful. The ecosystem takes care of itself as long as you don't buff one side by accident.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Clover. Clover is great:

  • Lush and green
  • Holds down soil we
  • Soft to walk on
  • Needs less water than grass
  • Needs less mowing
  • Bees love it
[–] slaughterhouse@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

+1 for clover. I "accidentally" spilled some clover seed outside our place (bugger off HOA), and it's slowly overtaking the grass they planted.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

If and when I ever get a home first thing I'm doing is planting clover.

[–] dai@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

My yard was infested with bur clover, horrible stuff when you have pets. Worse when your pets are poodle mixes. 

Other clover yeah they chill. 

[–] SpermHowitzer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

I spread a bunch of clover seed around my yard, and where the grass was struggling (I don’t water or fertilize at all) the clover took over, and where the grass was doing ok naturally the clover sort of let the grass have that space mostly. Now the whole yard looks nice, and the clover is just fucking loaded with bees all day. It’s great. My dog just lies in the lush clover and watches the bees buzz around.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's also way less ugly than dandelions that have finished blooming and started spreading seeds, as a bonus. In fact, it looks pleasing to the eye.

IIRC it also grows really easily, you can guerilla plant clover seeds around town at night if you really want to.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Question from a yank: Is it 'dandy lion' or 'dents-de-leon'?

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

He wrote it wrong. Its dandelion, and its pronounced in English just like you do, but dependent on the country, we have different words for it. In danish its “mælkebøtte”. Which means “milk bucket”. I think because of the white liquid they have inside. Its good for mosquito bites.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

So they're feeding bees Vegemite now.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 86 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Several bee factions see this as a vaccine and are opting out. /s

[–] musubibreakfast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Bee Joe Rogan is going hard on ivermectin

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 28 points 15 hours ago

Bee do our own rezzearch

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

hivemind at work.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago

This method is surprisingly effective at bringing back our god damn honey. We may not have to kill Nicolas Cage after all.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 30 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Soo, beekeepers thought for generations that bees (a animal too) only need sugar to live?

[–] Domitian@lemmy.world 48 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Beekeepers dont harvest the Pollen which the yeast is replacing. The lack of Pollen is most likelly a result of Monocultur.

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No, but they do replace the honey with sugar syrup

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago

Only during specific times of the year, it's a supplement not a main diet. If you notice your colony doesn't have enough honey for the winter, or it's a new colony, or needs medicated, then yes. Otherwise they should be eating their own stored honey made the way they like it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 15 points 18 hours ago

Why can't they just be easy to exploit gosh darn it

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 70 points 22 hours ago (16 children)

And so the house of cards grows by another level. We'll just modify this to add this missing thing. Never mind why it is missing. 10 years later we are 9 layers deep on plugging holes we've created that technological advancements got us out if until they don't and whoosh the cards come crashing down. The hardiness of nature replaced by the frivolity of man.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Couldn't agree more

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 26 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

I really wouldn't call nature "hardy" when an entire ecosystem can collapse when you can take one single species out of it

Let's remember that nature is what produced pandas

Though I still agree

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What ecosystem collapses when removing a single creature? Are you talking about pre-holoscene extinction ecosystems? Or are you talking about modern ecosystems (after most of the original biodiversity has already been obliterated, and "removing one species" is actually thousands down on the list of removals)?

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

Fair enough. It was meant yo contrast with man's obviously fragile solutioning on the fly.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Nature is extremely resilient and adaptable. Life has survived entire mass extinctions and come back flourishing

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago

Sure, nature writ large is resilient and adaptable.

Individual species die off all the time. Sometimes for stupid reasons.

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 28 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I understand the sentiment and don't generally disagree... But in most places around the world, Western honeybees (apis mellifera) are an introduced, agricultural livestock, like cattle, and don't really belong in the natural ecosystem. This is akin to farmers providing grain feed to their cows; they don't have to exclusively rely on pasture grass which didn't evolve to withstand hundreds of hungry herbivores mowing them to the ground every day. Also, honeybees are mediocre pollinators for most native plants. If native bees don't have to compete for resources with honeybees, that's a good thing for both the native bees and the plants that coevolved with them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Nomad 65 points 1 day ago

Here in Germany farmers are payed for a strip of each field to be planted with wild flowers instead. They don't lose money at all and nature keeps a bit of land. Simple and cheap.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 22 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I guess healthier hives would be less prone to winter die-off. Wonder what they feed the yeast on?

[–] bskm@feddit.nu 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's the tradeoff, it's bees /s

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 23 points 18 hours ago (5 children)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Bees all the way down.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago (15 children)

That is awesome news BUT

The real reason is humanity being a bunch of irresponsible greedy fuckwads, and I fear that this will be used not in the "let's be less greedy, let's fix the problems and let's use this to help the bees" but more as a "woohoo, bee factory farming!" and "W00T, this means we can fuck over bees even more, let's go!"

Can we please stop it with the greed?

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

Exact same thing I thought. Honey bees are actively harmful for the environment because they outcompete wild bees who are less efficient at pollination whilst being actively exploited for their honey. While improving their diet is certainly a net benefit for the bees, at the end of the day it just reads to me like farmers have more efficient workers to harvest more honey and exploit even more.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 317 points 1 day ago (39 children)

The solution is so simple. Crop/pollen diversity. Instead of letting fields lay fallow for crop rotation, they could plant diverse wildflower meadows to improve quality of bee health for the traveling bees that get shipped around for crop rotation. Or the bee keepers themselves that sell the services of their bees, could ensure diverse flower and pollen options when their bees aren't traveling.

load more comments (39 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›