this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)
Not the Onion
284 readers
3 users here now
For news articles which seem so much like satire that you're surprised they're not from The Onion.
Rules
- Headlines must exactly match the articles'.
- Posts must be genuine news articles, not satire, opinion, or tabloid pieces.
- News must be current.
- Popular political, religious, or social views are not Oniony, no matter how ridiculous you may think them.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That sounds like bullshit to me. It was too late to turn the sprinklers back on?
The fire fighters turned them off because the sprinklers use a lot of water and not in a manner thats actually effective in fighting the fire, effectively giving the firefighters less water and pressure to do their work.
Because of the way the system was designed, a single control covered the entire system, rather than be able to disable specific sections.
The arson waited for the firefighters to arrive and combat the first fire and confirm they disabled the sprinklers (you can hear he has a radio in the video.) So while the firefighters were busy with the first, he started another series of fires elsewhere and by the time the responders realized there was more fire/arson still on the premises, it was too dangerous to enter than part of the building and were forced to just pull everyone back and attempt to contain the fire from the edges. But in a massive warehouse full of paper products, once a fire gets hot enough sprinklers aren't that effective anymore.
Not sure if this particular type of suppression system only used water from the mains or if it had reserve tanks to allow it run for a set amount of time before needing to be recharged. But the facility was massive so there is no possible way to run the entire system for extended periods just using water from the city.