this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
729 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

19956 readers
1448 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] turdas@suppo.fi 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think Mars, assuming you terraform it, would be pretty close to that on both counts. Space planes might still be difficult, but the delta V is much lower and Olympus Mons would pretty much sit above the atmosphere.

[–] YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Holy shit, I hadn't considered that you could use Olympus Mons as a launch site cause it sticks so high up.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The best part about it is that it's an extremely gradual slope completely unlike the mountain ranges on Earth, so you could haul stuff up there on trucks or trains easily.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem is you can't have mountains like that on tectonically active planets (a mountain that big on earth would sink into the mantle), which is kind of a prequisite for a long-term magnetosphere so its unfortunately not something a species could likely ever have except as a result of terraforming a world like mars and setting up some kind of artificial magnetosphere.

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is there a lower density limit for having a magnetosphere though? A habitable planet with 1.5x earth radius and the same mass would be much easier to get off of.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess that could work? Earth is actually the densest planet in the solar system so our baseline mass > size ratio might actually be a bit abnormal.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was sure you were bullshitting, but no. Its true.

Iron and nickel core + enough mass for gravity to start compress the planed and we are just little more dense than Mercury.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Our core is also just huge, the outer core is larger than the moon and mercury.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that's true, how did Olympus mons get there in the first place? I thought it was a volcano.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Mars was geologically active but its core cooled.