this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
178 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

83799 readers
3071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Depends. Are they still making negative money with it? If so, then I'm gonna say no.

It's kind of like robbing a bank, killing everyone inside, then running out without taking anything, dropping your wallet in the process

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The whole business model of tech startups is to lose money until you cornered the market and make unfathomable amounts of money. By the time you realize „well shit, it really was the biggest heist in history“ it‘s already too late. They are too powerful to be punished for it. So this definition of yours plays right into their cards. The only saving grace here is that AI will never be profitable. But people said the same thing about Youtube and now it looks like Google might swallow Disney soon.

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That model only works if people actually adopt the technology

Oh they do. Idiots on fb messenger using ai to edit pictures for thrblolz. They are customers.

So many dumb people love AI.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think we're past profitable mattering at this point, even if the next model of chatGPT causes your eyes to bleed after prolonged use they'll make it profitable by forcing its use anywhere and everywhere no matter how inappropriate it is for any given application.

We're already there with some products like cars and phones where we just get told what to want and ignored if we disagree.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

*and also burning everyone else's money at the same time.

[–] msage@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

And everyone elses environment and rights somehow.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, something is only theft if it is profitable?

That's a wonderfully liberating new definition.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, let's just take the Mona Lisa and shread it.

Can't be stealing if I don't make money from it, right?

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you dense? That's not the question.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok chief. Because it really reads like you just said that in the comment above.

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know, I remember not too long ago when people on Lemmy tried to interpret each other charitably. Then everyone from Reddit came over, polluting the culture, and now practically every exchange on here feels like it's in bad faith.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Your account is 2 months old.

You called me "dense".

Not really in a position to opine there.