this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
29 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

42709 readers
218 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Serious question. We had a perfectly serviceable word, yet everyone decided to shift. Is it just that it's shorter to type?

If so, I feel for your colleagues trying to parse your code when all your variables use abbreviations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think the window for having that debate was some time around 1992.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I started as a CS major in 1997, and the term was not used.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The CS department at the University of Washington with all sorts of tech companies starting up? I mean, sure, if you want to believe your timeline, you're free to feel that way, but claiming this was standard by 1992 is ludicrous to me.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

People at the University of Washington don't refer to soda pop the same way as people at Berkley, or at MIT, or at Oxford. Why would they all have had the exact same term for writing software?

Edit: I'm being argumentative, I honestly have no idea what term was common then. At that point most people I knew referred to it as "computer stuff"

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org -2 points 13 hours ago

Since you've admitted to being argumentative, I'll point out that you misspelled Berkeley. I was accepted there into EECS, though neither MIT nor Oxford. As it turns out, if you don't apply, they don't notice you.