this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
20 points (91.7% liked)

Technology

42709 readers
191 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Serious question. We had a perfectly serviceable word, yet everyone decided to shift. Is it just that it's shorter to type?

If so, I feel for your colleagues trying to parse your code when all your variables use abbreviations.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 15 minutes ago

I think I noticed it widespread in the mid 2010s. Maybe around the same time that DIY and various hobby/handicrafts became just "making".

I still remember when I bought a tool off someone and was chatting about what i was going to do with it and they declared out of the blue: "I am a maker!". I just had to end the conversation as quickly and politely as possible. I don't know what the point of that statement was, but it made them sound a bit unhinged.

That said I'm sure the term coding was in use before, but more like a sub-activity that 'computer programmers' or 'software engineers' might do as part of their job. Maybe 'coder' and 'coding' became more popular with the spread of the term 'agile' into the bullshitting-consultant / middle-management cultures; I think that's when some people started using that term as an excuse for skipping 'design' and 'engineering' parts of any complex project.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Still more acceptable, in my opinion, than going from "using" to "leveraging"...

[–] mech@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Could have been worse, it could have turned into "apping".

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"ohh i work as an executioner in Microsoft back in 2005. Kinda fun doing executioning"

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 57 minutes ago

Oh I'd LOVE to work as executioner at Microsoft!

[–] coaxil@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Iirc it kinda started getting used interchangeably in the 60s but spawned from the term/name Fortran automatic coding systems.. I def would need to hit my search engine of choice and do some digging however. As for the mass public usage sometime 2010ish? With all that learn to code and code.org stuff coming into the mainstream.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org -2 points 4 hours ago

Cool. I'm drunk and don't care to do any digging, so if you'd like to do that on my behalf ...

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 28 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Code was in use relating to the set of instructions used to control a computer in 1946; with it becoming a verb by 1986. Programming was from 1945 as a first use in regards to computers; meaning "cause to be automatically regulated in a prescribed way.

Now the funny thing is the noun 'Program' in regards to computers in 1945 meant "series of coded instructions which directs a computer in carrying out a specific task"

So if we really work through the etymology a bit, coded instructions was first, then Program/ming, then Code and coding; though certainly 'encoding' would have been used before programming given the definition of 'coded instructions.'

So... Blame Ada Lovelace for not coming up with something catchy like 'lacing' which would have been far more camp (and much more accurate to the gender of early programmers).

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

And be grateful that we didn't start calling it "apping", even though the term "program" is effectively extinct these days.

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 2 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

For me apps are things that are fullscreen-only (on phones, Windows 8 apps, GNOME 3+), while programs are small CLI things or complex ones with discoverable GUIs where you have more control over the UI and placement.

Don't know what tiling window systems would make programs by the above definition.

[–] orionsbelt@midwest.social 3 points 6 hours ago

this is awesome, thanks!

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's probably predominantly because of the switch to mobile computing / smartphones / web being dominant, and everyone referring to programs there as "apps" / applications.

i.e. If you write a mobile app with a function-as-a-service backend, you will never compile what someone would refer to as a "program", so calling yourself a "programmer" (as-in, someone who makes programs) feels inaccurate and a not helpful description for people. "Coder" (as-in, someone who writes code) is a vaguer in terms of the type of code you write and more accurate in terms of what you spend your time producing.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 10 points 6 hours ago

Programming could also refer to lower paid jobs operating machines, like a CNC Programmer or Radio programs.

So the real computer software people started using the term “software engineering”. But that’s too long, so ‘coding’.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is a guess but I feel like it was around the time that most coding was done for things that weren't explicitly "programs", like web design CSS/Java and smartphone "apps".

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Also anyone writing scripts, or even just using stuff like AWS Lambda / functions as a service, etc. etc.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think the window for having that debate was some time around 1992.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I started as a CS major in 1997, and the term was not used.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The CS department at the University of Washington with all sorts of tech companies starting up? I mean, sure, if you want to believe your timeline, you're free to feel that way, but claiming this was standard by 1992 is ludicrous to me.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

People at the University of Washington don't refer to soda pop the same way as people at Berkley, or at MIT, or at Oxford. Why would they all have had the exact same term for writing software?

Edit: I'm being argumentative, I honestly have no idea what term was common then. At that point most people I knew referred to it as "computer stuff"

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 0 points 3 hours ago

Since you've admitted to being argumentative, I'll point out that you misspelled Berkeley. I was accepted there into EECS, though neither MIT nor Oxford. As it turns out, if you don't apply, they don't notice you.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago

I described myself as a coder for a while starting somewhere around '03 or '04 IIRC.