Progressive Politics

4507 readers

781 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

201

ICE monitoring app takedowns violated the First Amendment (appleinsider.com)

submitted 2 days ago by CubitOom to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/45175219

The lawsuit concerned itself with Eyes Up, an app that allowed users to post videos and details about ICE activity. However, in October 2025, Apple removed apps that performed similar actions, including ICEBlock, Red Dot, and Eyes Up.

At the time, the apps were told by Apple that it had received information from law enforcement for violations of the App Store guidelines. Specifically, guideline 1.1.1 prohibits defamatory, discriminatory, or mean-spirited content.

Another plaintiff of the lawsuit, the Facebook group "ICE Sightings - Chicagoland," was disabled on October 14, with Facebook notifying that it went against community standards.

This occurred at the same time as then-U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi posted to social media about the matter. Bondi said that Facebook closed a large group used to dox ICE agents in Chicago after outreach from the Department of Justice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CubitOom 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm of the mind that anyone funded by taxes shouldn't need to hide their identities.

Its not doxing to say that a this publicly funded person is committing a crime. Their identities should be public records and the crimes they commit should be investigated.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well they should be wearing (and showing) ID, for one.

Generally I think it's fair to leave officials' private identities out of it - with the caveat of my previous comment.