politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Iran isn't really fractured. That SoH is declared open (but with Iran control) when ceasefire agreement sets, then closed shortly after when Zio side does not implement their obligations is not fracture. Ghalibaf, if he's main negotiator, is not publicly different from IRGC view, and Trump's announcements that a deal for complete surrender by Iran was already agreed is simply pure BS made to profit from financial market volatility.
Still, Iran's negotiations are far too passive. Needs to negotiate with world on opening SoH, and World negotiate with US on leaving, so that SoH can reopen. That is only eventual outcome US can afford, but world just waiting passively for US to just leave before dealing with Iran is a longer delay on SoH full flow, as well as longer delay to force US to leave. Iran should also make constructive posts on nuclear issue. Specifically reparations for existing stockpile, and long term contract for Uranium enrichment services that make it more valuable to export than use. US side is completely incapable of negotiating quickly any other option other than cash for uranium, or complete clone of JCPOA.
Still, by asking Iran to repeat their 10 point plan as basis for negotiation, it is the beginning of US surrender process. It's just moving far too slow for global health.