this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
63 points (83.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1805 readers
338 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 15 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Rimu went straight to defense of MrKaplan and attacking luminous for being anti-zionist, to the point of Kaplan defederating from anarchist.nexus.

Kind of a words vs actions thing here. IMO, rimu is firmly in the wrong, but I also see no reason for MM to preventively ban, but not my comm so not my decision.

[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of a words vs actions thing here. IMO, rimu is firmly in the wrong, but I also see no reason for MM to preventively ban, but not my comm so not my decision.

To add clarification to that, there has been a wave of LW accounts promoting Zionism or just brigading my communities. With that has been a wave of bans (you can check the logs) both reactive and proactive. I know some people don't like proactive bans, although, honestly it's unreasonable to expect mods to let shit slide when they see a person they know will cause trouble.

The fact people harass me here for this doesn't really help the case against proactive bans. And I assume the reactions I'll get from here will further reinforce this.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Did my comment seem like an attack? I was just saying its not how I like to handle things, but your comm you get the choice.

[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not at all. I didn't mean to sound defensive. I'm usually on high alert when I comment here since others have attacked me and the general sentiment on Lemmy is hostile against proactive moderation even when it is needed to keep communities afloat. I just wanted to be clear on why I do things because there are people who do expect mods to let things like this slide. It's ultimately up to each mod how they run their communities, and it's also situational. Some communities might not need proactive moderation at all.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 6 hours ago

OK just checking, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't coming across different than intended

Everyone has a different threshold for a preemptive ban, to me it depends more on interaction. If there isnt any interaction, to me a ban just gets their attention, so I don't bother. If there's some (or interaction outside the community that makes it clear its about to be a problem), thats when I personally take action.

Again though, everyone can have their own approach. If they dont like it, they can start their own comm - thats what makes the fediverse great.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

So what you're saying is that the banning has absolutely nothing to do with anything in Blaze's post and he's just either intentionally or ignorantly misdirecting us.

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Blaze can get blinded by their love/prefer towards piefed platform. It's not the first time they've been willing to run cover for it and rimus particular design choices.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

BTW, this is what Marxist was referring to (albeit in a way that was so confusing I didnt even follow at first)

For reference:

https://anarchist.nexus/post/603903

Just browse around for rimu.

Edit: and @Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com made a great summary in that thread of Kaplan's behavior.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It makes for very confusing arguments when one person doesn't have important context and the other doesn't know that person doesn't have it.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

tbf, I knew the context and I didn't follow their comments at first either, so I get it

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

Marxists do tend to speak in riddles 🤔