this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
119 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87879 readers
3951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 26 points 2 months ago (5 children)

laughs in Firefox/Librewolf

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No worries, play store-recaptcha is coming for you too!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

affects mobile the most obviously... but google's playbook is to basically have forced telemetry always and enforce integrity of their telemetry, and by extension advertising etc.

https://piunikaweb.com/2026/05/07/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement/ - this just seems like an ok article for it, I did a simple web search and it came up, but others certainly exist if you dislike the source.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Looking forward to when they remove the old options & force PC users to scan reCAPTCHA QRs:

“Scan to verify you’re human” screenshot

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Those sites will be dead to me :)

QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

I still won't actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How do the rewrites work? Is it like Redirector?

Would be awesome if I could just import my Redirector regex json file

[–] lemongarlic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How are people without phones expected to pass the captcha?

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Waiting for another player....

PRESS START TO JOIN

[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Corpo banned it for compatibility with crap code apparently

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The MV3 support in firefox is even stricter than in Chrome. I found that chrome will let you sidestep CSP to make an HTTP request. Firefox won't.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you found, but firefox still supports the web request blocking API for Mv3 extensions, which is what ublock needs.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was debugging one of my favourite extensions this week to figure out why it didn't work on firefox. It hadn't been updated in years, so something changed in firefox in the last few months.

I assume the Chrome version still works. I'm not installing it.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if it hadn't been updated in years then it will be an Mv2 extension, irrelevant to discussion of Mv3 strictness.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

It was MV3. I had to rewrite the manifest as V2 to get it working.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

FF support is getting worse and worse though.

Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 2 months ago

Fun fact: many sites that say that they don't support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox "less secure" or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

(Not all sites ofc)

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That isn't FF support. That is chrome doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by implementing non-standard functionality to abuse their market dominance.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au -1 points 2 months ago

Sure but if devs don't test sites in Firefox then very they don't support Firefox.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, what sites don't work in firefox?

Yet to see one.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've answered this so many times.

Banks, my uni, accounting software I use at work.

Its a well acknowledged and much discussed fact that the web is buggy with ff.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 2 months ago

Wack. Its usually chrome that shits the bed. Or its because their app cant tolerate an adblocker.

Doesn't match up with my lived experience. Sorry for your loss.