this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
109 points (96.6% liked)

3DPrinting

23687 readers
59 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip -3 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It's neat in concept, but such a waste of material over stick framing.

Also, do you need to bust out the impact drill every time you want to hang a photo? What it you need to move an outlet?

Also also, what happened if you foundation shifts, like at all?

And how's the insulation on this? Nothing is thermally broken, you're gonna have a good amount of heat going through those rounded corners.

[–] Nomad 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I always thought it curious that Americans like to build houses that blow away while experiencing lots of hurricanes all the time.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure, pretend like European clay roofing tiles do not blow off and European stonework isn't a patch quilt of continuous repair.

[–] Nomad 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Actually the only tiles blowing away, even in a storm are those already lose. And they are easy and cheap to replace.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

easy and cheap to replace

That's the guiding philosophy under the American housing industry.

[–] Nomad 2 points 5 days ago

Just with not caring about the safety of the occupants at all.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Stone or concrete walls are normal in many countries.

You can indeed use a hammer drill to drill holes. You can buy them for as little as 30 dollars these days. And you can use an angle grinder to make cutouts for cables/tubes, and apply plaster afterwards.

Many houses in the colder regions already have cavity walls with insulation in between the walls regardless of the building method, so I don't think this method is very wasteful in amount of material.

However, I agree that 3D printing houses had various downsides, such as the weird surface, inflexibility to modify/expand/repair after the initial build and potentiality worse insulation characteristics. I am more of a believer in prefabricated houses, where building houses becomes an industry instead of a project.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

You print 2 layers with an air gap between. Themis gap gives room for plumbing and electrical, and also serves as an insulation layer. A thin layer of still air has relatively low thermal conductivity, minimizing heat exchange between inside and outside.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

The people who thought 3D printed houses were innovative had no idea how houses are built.