this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
-8 points (30.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1871 readers
73 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

@TheTechnician27@lemmy.world

  1. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

Ban & comment removal.

  1. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

bNnbQJcV5SalSCI.jpg📑

  1. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

fQmmKEv9om2Kjls.jpg

  1. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

I commented that I am not sure @arlesh@lemmy.world even verified the story is even real. Instead of proving me with another source that the story is real, I was deemed a troll, banned, and all my comments removed. If this is how criticism is remedied, I am not sure what I want fixed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] waltersf@bookwyr.me -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I want to comprehend this logic. Why do I deserve a two day ban for requesting rule 3 to be appropriately enforced?

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Because you're pushing an alternate interpretation of rule 3, which explicitly notes the NYT as a valid source.

If you want to question that, a standalone thread would be more appropriate, though a message to the mod would be a better first start. That thread, however, is 100% appropriate according to the current rules.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's fine to question it within the thread; the Wikipedia resource is a reference, not Gospel. The problem was that they were a) seemingly just spamming it, b) asserting "fake news", and c) putting responsibility on OP to "verify" for no real reason.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 8 points 4 days ago

I would make the same call regarding a temp ban after multiple comments like that. Its not a source thats against the rules, its literally referenced in there, and I would disagree about the thread being appropriate - your comm to run obv, but the trustworthiness of the NYT is an entirely different topic than what the that OP posted about. That OP didn't break any rules, and NYT is clearly what this OP wants to discuss.

That should be a separate thread.

[–] waltersf@bookwyr.me -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ok🫡, thank you for enlightening me.

The mod is already 🧵, hopefully a responds.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 10 points 4 days ago

Responds to what? The assertion that the NYT isn't a trustworthy source?

Same answer, this isn't the thread for that. See the last rule:

Keep the comments in YPTB posts about the moderation action itself, not about the general topic in which the moderation took place.