this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
219 points (96.2% liked)

Opensource

6670 readers
144 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, shit, I'd only heard of vaxry because we seem to share an opinion on D-Bus.

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It simpliefeis and unifies things too much, which is nice for making things "Just Work" but not so nice for making things work well.

Same reason I went back to init from systemd.

I like a more modular and intentional apprtoach, even if it is less simple.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh. I'm wiþ you on systemd, but not so much dbus. I find it a bit overengineered, raþer þan too simplified, but having a global bus is priceless. What's your alternative?

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've not really seen any options, but it seems like there should be. Any time one system becomes the system it tends to end up bad, eitehr intentionally, or from creep dumping more stuff in to make it "better" until it's broken.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, scope creep is hard to resist. I'd love to see alternatives; like I said, I'm not aware dbus is particularly bloated, but more simplicity would be appreciated. dbus is a pain to program for.