this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
394 points (89.2% liked)

Political Memes

12484 readers
2028 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/52272272

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nobody ask what comrad Molotov was doing in '39!

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How did this thread become about the Hitler-Chamberlain pact and the Molotov Ribbentrop pact all of a sudden?

[–] Souvenir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The meme is about never compromising with fascists.

You can argue that both Stalin/Molotov and Chamberlain had good reasons to sign a (temporary) compromise with fascist Germany. Which means you believe you should sometimes compromise with fascists.

Or you can argue that Stalin and Chamberlain were wrong to compromise with fascists. Which means you agree with the meme that you should never compromise with fascists.

But this meme was originally posted on lemmy.ml, where a lot of users will reflexively defend Stalin for compromising with fascist Germany (they're also here) but then post memes which say it's never ok to compromise with fascists. Which is double think. You either think it's sometimes acceptable, or you think it's never acceptable to compromise with fascists.

Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort people feel when their beliefs conflict with each other. People often react in weird ways when they're suffering from it. You can witness plenty of it in this comment section.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Well said! Chamberlain's appeasement is rightfully excorciated while Stalin's collaboration is excused and defended. Fucking pathetic how ideologues bend and twist.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently the "alliance with Hitler" phase of the Soviet Union is a hotbutton issue for .ml users

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

Next up Red Fascism.

[–] Souvenir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hush now.

I think you'll find that when Stalin compromised with fascists, that was a very good thing, that's why despite being very proud of making this supposedly necessary compromise, discussing the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was taboo in the Soviet Union till 1989. They simply didn't want to make a big thing of it, because Stalin was such a modest and down to earth guy.

LOL

Always funny watching the tankies tie themselves in knots defending it.