this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
157 points (87.2% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

9235 readers
561 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So I am being completly stupid, I am fine with it.

But while I do not understand what happend, I don't pretend I do.

What is she telling him? I have no idea, and that could (or not) be part of the explaination.

His reaction looks like anger. It may not be. But it looks like it. Yet what causes this anger? Is it understandable to be angry in such cases?

Anger should not allow us to be violent, and he is wrong to beat her. One this I totally agree. But no, I can't judge the cases.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes you absolutely can. He assaulted her. Anyone in this thread leaning away from that is defending this situation and looking for justification for his actions.

It's assault. It's fucking gross.

[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Once more, the context, the full story, may not make things better for him.

He may deserve a stricter punishment than you would be willing to give him without the context.

Understanding is not defending him. It is defending the research of a fair judgement.

I especially invite you to think about the fact he could be reacting judgementaly to that she says, without taking the time to understand fully. As you are reacting now. And that it would be very wrong of him.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My point is context isn't necessary to know he's so far beyond being in the wrong and the degree people wanna defend him in these comments over "cOnTExt" is a fucking laugh.

Context isn't necessary in this situation it would only offer insight into what a piece of shit he is, not deciding if he is a piece of shit. So anyone asking for context before making their judgement is, for lack of better words and to make the point very clear, a fucking moron.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My point is context isn’t necessary to know he’s so far beyond being in the wrong and the degree people wanna defend him in these comments over “cOnTExt” is a fucking laugh.

Say it louder for the back.

I just stumbled on this thread and it's really disappointing. Sorry (but maybe not sorry?) someone accused you of being me simply for standing up for the woman in the video.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 5 points 18 hours ago

It's fucking infuriating.