Crazy Fucking Videos

9235 readers

447 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

No hate speech of any kind.
Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

dylpickles@lemmy.world

MutatedBass@lemmy.world

TimeNaan@lemmy.world

157

This happened in Louisville, Kentucky (cdn.imgchest.com)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Amine_Jouahri@lemmy.world to c/crazyfuckingvideos@lemmy.world

219 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to her friend, it was their second date and she told him she didn't want to se him anymore. Someone else posted the article with her friend's version of the story, yesterday with two links. Here is the one without a paywall :

https://www.themarysue.com/this-man-needs-to-go-louisville-local-warns-of-violent-man-who-allegedly-attacked-her-friend-after-she-rejected-him-on-the-second-date/

[–] DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

I fail to see how he supposedly attacked her first...

This blog is not a news source.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Look how non aggressive he is. He definitely didn't stand up and b-line to kick her while she's down

[–] DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org -1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Listen man, if you want to deny her aggression that preceded all this that's fine, but don't act like you're standing up for women while doing so.

You're denying basic agency to women, you misogynist.

Never developed past the first-wave of feminism?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

She acknowledges herself as the initiator/ aggressor in her Facebook post here:

In this post she

acknowledges that she initiated the attack.
acknowledges that the drink wasn't hers.
states why she initiated the attack (online harassment?)
claims she didn't make physical contact (video evidence challenges/ refutes this), but this is contradicted by her earlier statement.
and acknowledges that she picked up a deadly weapon.

To those who think the woman was justified in their conduct here, you very much want her to get a good lawyer. Because her own words, along with the video, go very strongly against the narrative which people trying to set up here, that she was justified in her use of force along the escalation ladder.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 23 hours ago

SHE'S THREATENING HIS LIFE SOMEBODY STOP HER.

Justified response.

This is how you're worthless brain works?

Shut the fuck up idiot.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What a dip shit you are

[–] DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Now screenshot her invading his space literally 1 second before this.

Throwing a drink in someones face is harmless, threatening someone with a bottle is not.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 2 points 23 hours ago

"Invading his space"

Moron shit to say