this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Recall Alerts

346 readers
1 users here now

A place to post product recalls. Recalls can be national or local, even just one store down the street. Nor are they limited to one country, if a product is declared unsafe by the government or the maker, share it here.

Title should reflect what's being recalled, body should say where and/or have a link to the announcement.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

More of a gun cabinet really. If the lock doesn't work is it really safe?

[–] crawley@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The safes contain a biometric reader that allows unpaired fingerprints to open the safe until a fingerprint is programmed, allowing unauthorized persons, including children, to access hazardous contents, including firearms

It's not that the lock doesn't work, it's that they never set it up.

[–] enki@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Lock should not default to "any print unlocks it until it's programmed." Like someone mentioned above, if you don't add a fingerprint to your phone, then fingerprint unlock is disabled. Otherwise, anyone could get into your phone if you didn't set up your fingerprint. And that's a PHONE, not a gun safe.

The manufacturer should have required the physical key to be present and the safe unlocked before you can program a code or fingerprint. This is how cheap ass Amazon combo locks work. While I feel the onus is almost entirely on the parents here, the manufacturer is at the very least negligent in its design.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So, the parents thought it magically came pre-programmed with their fingerprints from the factory and went; "hey, it works out of the box, how neat is that?!"

I'm sure they could've/should've taken higher quality idiots into account when making the thing, but is it really too much to ask of parents to read a manual and verify that a lock works as it should, when it is to keep firearms out of reach from your children?

[–] stevehobbes@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

I mean, yes? It’s insane to think that a fingerprint reader is designed, by default, to open from any fingerprint.

I don’t think it’s a stretch to believe that if you put your finger on a lock and it unlocks that you might believe it also programmed itself to use only that fingerprint.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Sorry, but this is a really stupid thing to say. A fingerprint scanner shouldn't work unless a fingerprint has explicitly been set up.