this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1576 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

72471 readers
3085 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

I don't remember the name of the effect, but it seems to happen a lot of times when newer technologies makes things consume less. People end up consuming more, either by increase of size, duration of use of using more of the thing.

[–] raginghummus@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes! It's called Jevons paradox

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This isn't an example of that though, its just a result of deliberately terrible emissions regulation brought on by lobbying.

Yep, providing exemptions for vehicles under the weight threshold where a commercial driver's license is required is dumb.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Could you elaborate? Edit: I see, other people mentioned in the thread about the lobbies and efforts to mask emissions.

[–] s_s@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Vacuum cleaners are the classic example, IMO.

When introduced, they were supposed to make cleaning rugs take less time, freeing time and effort for other activities, but instead housewives just cleaned their rugs more often.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Would means rugs are quite a bit cleaner now, so I would say the vacuum did its job.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Induced demand. If the option is there people will use it.

[–] VirginMojito@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

led comes to mind here with this explanation. extremely more efficient then most other light sources. but because it is so efficient we see led being used everywhere. and almost never turned of because people say it barely uses any power. also the operating time is so high that companies purposely put components behind the led that break so they can sell more. (similar what they did to the old light bulb)

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

also the operating time is so high that companies purposely put components behind the led that break so they can sell more.

Could you elaborate with more detail, or share some links for articles that describe that?